invisible strands (off topic)
laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Mon Apr 3 00:11:37 UTC 2000
At 4:45 PM -0500 4/2/00, Tom Kysilko wrote (message appended below).
This is very helpful, or at least encouraging. Can you, or someone (else?)
who uses some approximant of Macintosh/Eudora, tell me where the "show all
headers" command would be, if indeed it's available to me as a selection
option? Or should I assume from the last part of what follows that it's
not something I can fix on my end? Thanx.
>When I select "Show all headers" (or "blah, blah, blah"), here's what it
><x.-.h.t.m.l><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
><META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=GENERATOR>
><DIV>A friend of mine from the Chicago area says that it's common in her
>to hear "fiancé" pronounced as if it rhymed with nuance. I'm from California,
>part of my family is southern and part midwestern, and I have heard that
>pronunciation in my life. How common is it? How correct is it?</DIV>
>The dots in the "H.T.M.L" are added to prevent HTML-aware e-mail clients
>from treating this as HTML content, which is what it is. So why does this
>look like blank space to some? I'm not sure. One possibility, this
>message is X-HTML encoded. I don't know what that is, but perhaps George's
>and Larry's clients don't either. Another possibility, what we have here
>is in Microsoft's implementation of HTML, which is enough different from
>everyone else's (especially Netscape's) to cause trouble.
>There may be a tweak to their client settings that would cause this content
>to appear, but if George hasn't found it, that is pretty unlikely. In my
>experience, the only solution is to complain to users of Outlook Express to
>TURN OFF THE @#$&%^!-ing HTML ENCODING.
> Tom Kysilko Practical Data Services
> pds at visi.com Saint Paul MN USA
More information about the Ads-l