Needs specimen

Beverly Flanigan flanigan at OAK.CATS.OHIOU.EDU
Fri Mar 10 18:47:45 UTC 2000


At 01:44 AM 3/10/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Sorry if this has already been addressed/disposed of earlier in the
>thread; I haven't actually been following the thread but this just
>caught my eye:
>
>Arnold Zwicky wrote:
> >
> > in central ohio, it is indeed frequent, and many locals do not use
> > NEED/WANT V-presprt.
>
>It's a technicality, I suppose, but surely the verb in the phrase "needs
>cleaning" (or whatever) is not a present participle, but rather a
>gerund.  It's the direct object.  The fact that this grammatical
>construction is so basic and straightforward ("The bed needs making"; "I
>need your loving": subject-verb-object) makes it seem much more
>"correct" to those whose dialect uses it than "The bed needs made" or "I
>need loved by you(?)" which is harder to analyze.
>
>I assume it is a shortening of "to be made," "to be loved"; if so, then
>it's not really a past participle (qua past participle) but a shortening
>of the passive infinitive--i.e., another noun construction used as the
>direct object.  It's just an elliptical construction that, to those not
>used to it, is as "non-English" as leaving out the "to" in "I need go"
>or "I want eat." (Or do those who leave out the "to be" of the passive
>infinitive likewise leave out the "to" of the active infinitive in such
>constructions?)
>
>James E. Clapp

The appropriate analogy is to "The cat wants out" or "Do you want in?"  No,
users of these constructions do not leave out the infinitive 'to' in a V to
V construction.

BTW, as a Northerner, I usually use the gerund form "It needs
cleaning"--which sounds as weird and "ungrammatical" to my southern Ohio
students as "needs cleaned" does to newcomers to this area.  So it's not
"basic and straightforward" to all!



More information about the Ads-l mailing list