'Critical' Age

[Bob Haas]

Oops, sorry folks, that was a private message--rather obviously--and didn't
have anything to do with the list at all.  My bad--as the kids say.  Hey,
I'm still using the slang.

> From: Bob Haas <highbob at mindspring.com>
> Reply-To: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:51:30 -0500
> To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: 'Critical' Age
>
> I'm sorry.  I'll think of you while I drink my coffee and read the paper.
> BTW, Scott's goggles were fun.  I thought later, though, that we should've
> taken them down to the park.  That would've been a good place for a try-out.
>
>> From: Bob Fitzke <fitzke at VOYAGER.NET>
>> Reply-To: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 09:22:21 -0500
>> To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: 'Critical' Age
>>
>> Thanks for the site.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> "Aaron E. Drews" wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Bob Fitzke wrote:
>>>
>>> }Reading thus stimulated a question, "Has anyone ever analyzed the evolution
>>> of
>>> }language from the perspective of evolutionary theory?"
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about the Lg&Evol group here.  Check out their website from
>>> http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk  (no, this isn't a plug).   I know there's a lot
>>> of computational stuff, but I'm sure *someone* has alluded to Darwin.
>>>
>>> --Aaron
>>>
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>> Aaron E. Drews                               The University of Edinburgh
>>> aaron at ling.ed.ac.uk                  Departments of English Language and
>>> http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/~aaron       Theoretical & Applied  Linguistics
>>>
>>> "MERE ACCUMULATION OF OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE IS NOT PROOF"
>>> --Death