New use of "unless"?
flanigan at OAK.CATS.OHIOU.EDU
Tue Jan 23 17:09:23 UTC 2001
At 11:25 AM 1/23/01 -0500, you wrote:
>At 11:10 AM 1/23/2001 -0500, Beverly Olson Flanigan wrote:
> >[re "unlest"]: I would assume the /t/ is added as liaison with the following
> >vowel, as in "acrosst", "oncet", "twicet," etc.--common in much of the
> >But I suppose "lest" alone (re: Salovesh) is derived from "unless" too,
> >which suggests the usage of both has a long history.
>OED2 traces "lest" to an OE phrase that contains the ancestor of "less," and
>traces "unless" to a ME phrase containing "less" that looks as if it
>collapsed into a single word during the 15th century. So, "lest" and
>"unless" are, strictly speaking, cousins rather than parent/child.
>OED2 has entries for "unlest" and "unleast." All citations seems to be from
>the 16th century, so the phenomenon of speakers fusing unless/unle(a)st/lest
>is probably not new, and may well have persisted for centuries in the spoken
>rather than the formal written language.
>Greg Downing, at greg.downing at nyu.edu or gd2 at is2.nyu.edu
Oops! Thanks to you and Larry for pointing this out--I was shooting from
the hip, obviously.
Beverly Olson Flanigan Department of Linguistics
Ohio University Athens, OH 45701
Ph.: (740) 593-4568 Fax: (740) 593-2967
More information about the Ads-l