Bungable

Duane Campbell dcamp911 at JUNO.COM
Sun Mar 3 22:07:50 UTC 2002


On Sun, 3 Mar 2002 16:00:52 EST Bapopik at AOL.COM writes:
>
>    Probably not.  They're not bungable.  There's a word for you!
> Post that!

Personally I would feel more comfortable if it were "bungeable".

D



More information about the Ads-l mailing list