FW: FW: Same sound, opposite meaning
abatefr at EARTHLINK.NET
Fri May 10 14:34:08 UTC 2002
Mark M and Fred S had this exchange:
#> > I don't agree. "Verbal" in the strict and original sense and my usage
#> > includes written and oral language; in sloppyXXXXXX common present use
#> > it refers to oral language only, explicitly opposed to written.
#"Verbal" meaning "oral" goes back to 1591 and was used in this sense by
#Pepys, Swift, Hume, Scott, and Lincoln. Not exactly a sloppy recent
Well! (eyebrows up) Thanks for that dating. I still feel it's sloppy,
depriving us of a useful word ("verbal" = 'in words') by stealing it for
a sense we already have a perfectly good word for ("oral"), but it's
obviously got a long pedigree.
Words are primarily spoken, it seems to me, as all language is. The written
form is a minority offshoot. So, even etymologically, "verbal" refers to
the spoken word.
I think the contrast is between "oral" (or "verbal") and "written". We are
not deprived of anything.
More information about the Ads-l