C. Faulkner on the Possessive Antecedent Proscription
Bethany K. Dumas
dumasb at UTKUX.UTCC.UTK.EDU
Wed Jun 4 16:18:43 UTC 2003
>I'm not sure. I do remember his covering that. When we went over usage, we
>had a series of lengthy tests with all sorts of constructions. (I still use
>those in my grammar class to show the narrower interpretations of correct
>usage--something students are completely ignorant of.) Those constructions are
>on those old tests. I also think that he discussed the error when he talked
>about their needing to be a possessive case subject idea with gerunds (a
>concept much more debatable than he allowed). Since the possessive functioned
>with repect to the gerund only, further references in the sentence needed to be
>to the idea represented in the gerund and not to something modifying that
That sounds like him!
As I told Arnold earlier, I never had freshman English - so when I arrived
at graduate school and was to teach freshman English, I took Claude's
course (400) in how to teach freshman comp. He did his best to keep us a
day or two ahead of our students.
The thing I most remember from that semester and freshman English was that
I taught a young football player 5 days a week - I was teaching "X"
(remedial) English, and the poor guy had to come to a MWF class and also
a TR lab with me. His name was Tommy Brasher (sp?), and he later played
More information about the Ads-l