Remarkable Story of the Sports Term "Upset"
george.thompson at NYU.EDU
Wed Jun 4 16:25:06 UTC 2003
Actually, on November 12, 2002, under the heading "Upset" in Horseracing, I submitted passages retrieved from the NYTimes online, by searching for the words "upset" and "racing" in the same story. I found citations of "upset" used as a verb as far back as 1865, in the context of "upsetting the calculations, or expectations," of horse-players, and the following from 1877:
The programme for to-day at Monmouth Park indicates a victory for the favorite in each of the four events, but racing is so uncertain that there may be a startling upset. New York Times, July 17, 1877, p. 8 There were other late 19th C. citations of the word used as a noun in this sense, as for instance This proved another upset for the favorites, Rosary, a very cheap one, winning in 1:17 ¼, Andrian second, and Eva S. third. New York Times, May 17, 1883, p. 2.
I noted at the time that I did not turn up a citation of the verb in the context of "this horse upset that horse" and still haven't, though neither have I looked.
The coincidence that the horse that beat Man o' War would be named Upset lead us to a discussion of the Shandy-Lack theory of onomastic determinism. See my submission of November 15, 2002 and several replies.
I would still like to have references to early post-1921 statements that it was Upset's defeat of Man o' War that gave the word "upset" this sense. It's common knowledge -- I knew it -- but where did it begin?
More information about the Ads-l