(OT) relevant indeed

James A. Landau JJJRLandau at AOL.COM
Fri Jun 27 13:46:28 UTC 2003

In a message dated 6/27/2003 4:58:49 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
maxiogee at ESATCLEAR.IE writes:

> On Déardaoin, Meith 26, 2003, at 22:13 Europe/Dublin, Arnold Zwicky
> wrote:
> >   'Wellington's victory at Waterloo  <snip>
> Ah, but he wasn't called "Wellington"!
> His name was Arthur Wellesley, and his title was The Duke of Wellington.

Worse.  Arthur Wellesley, in addition to his British title of "Duke of 
Wellington", had also been awarded (I believe by Portugal) the title of "Duke of 

                       - Jim Landau

More information about the Ads-l mailing list