What does "laconic" mean?
bgzimmer at RCI.RUTGERS.EDU
Wed Aug 17 21:14:59 UTC 2005
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:54:00 -0400, sagehen <sagehen at WESTELCOM.COM> wrote:
>Since fiction is clearly the setting where "laconic" does most of its
>work, I'd guess that its appearance in reference to characters who also
>were depicted as >emotionless; affectless; dispassionate< might well
>lead to the assumption that "laconic" was just another way of alluding
>to that quality.
Definitions of "laconic" frequently suggest an icy rudeness underlying the
* Webster's 1913: "concise with the additional quality of pithiness,
sometimes of brusqueness"
* AHD4 (under "silent"): "denotes terseness or conciseness in expression,
but when applied to people it often implies an unwillingness to use words"
* MW10: "concise to the point of seeming rude or mysterious"
So I can see how the 'chilly' secondary sense might have overtaken the
'pithy' primary sense.
That "-onic" ending might also connote to some a kind of cold, mechanistic
nature... robotic, perhaps?
More information about the Ads-l