how to escalate a problem

Jonathan Lighter wuxxmupp2000 at YAHOO.COM
Wed Aug 31 19:36:45 UTC 2005

I was thinking of people for whom the new sense is the *only* sense.


"Arnold M. Zwicky" <zwicky at CSLI.STANFORD.EDU> wrote:
---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
Sender: American Dialect Society
Poster: "Arnold M. Zwicky"
Subject: Re: how to escalate a problem

On Aug 31, 2005, at 10:20 AM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:

> So "escalating" a disaster, like the hurricane, is a good thing.
> What about "the disaster is escalating" (about to be reviewed by
> people in charge) ?
> Such speakers must think that when the Vietnam War was "escalated,"
> it was "bucked" to a higher authority. (Or "hire authority," as it
> soon will be.)


we're dealing with a new sense of "escalate" here -- well, one that
once was new in a relatively specialized context but now seems to be
spreading. what's at issue is whether the new sense arose from a
metaphorical extension or by malapropism.

in either case, a new sense will coexist with older senses. this is
the way semantic change -- indeed, all linguistic change -- works:
new variants coexist with old ones, sometimes virtually forever.
sometimes, of course, the old variant eventually disappears, but it
never disappears *immediately*. a new sense of "escalate" doesn't
shift all the old senses.

this coexistence of senses isn't particularly problematic. polysemy
is everywhere.

arnold (zwicky at

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

More information about the Ads-l mailing list