"sub" (= substitute) in wrong-ordered whatzit
jester at PANIX.COM
Sun Dec 4 03:46:15 UTC 2005
This whole business of _substitute_/_exchange_/_whatever_ with the
wrong order of things to substitute for--it really gets my inner
prescriptivist out, and now I'm seeing it everywhere. I'm not
sure anyone's reported this for the shortened _sub_ yet, so here's
an example I saw a half-hour ago. Please excuse the technicalness
of it; it's from a discussion of how to set up wireless networking
on FreeBSD (a Unix variant):
ifconfig_wi0="inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.xxx ssid yourssid
wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey 0x.........................."
Couple of notes - sub wi0 for your nic, and I use static.
In the first line "ifconfig_wi0" is an instruction to set up a
network configuration for a device named "wi0", which is for a
kind of wireless card. In the last line, the writer says "sub
wi0 for your nic", meaning "where I say _wi0_, instead use the
device name for your particular network card", so that if you
had a card based on the Atheros chipset you would say
Again, excuse the technicalness, but in short, this line says
"sub OLD for your NEW".
It never ends.
More information about the Ads-l