Antedating of "Unemployment"
laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Mon Jan 17 16:49:09 UTC 2005
At 9:37 AM -0500 1/17/05, Fred Shapiro wrote:
>This is a word whose history has been much written about, including by
>E. P. Thompson in The Making of the English Working Class (Thompson
>said he had seen it used in the 1830s, but gave no citations). I
>remember Geoffrey Nunberg was interested in it a while back.
>unemployment (OED 1888)
>1717 _The Censor_ (ed. 2) 191 (Eighteenth Century Collections Online)
>When I look forwards, and anticipate in Thought the Prospect of those
>burning Months ... when the _Female Shopkeepers_ will be the only
>Beauties left us; when scarce a _powder'd Perriwig_ will be seen in
>the Evening from a _Coffeehouse-Balcony_, and I may lay all Day on the
>Solitary Board buried in Dust and Obscurity, and owe a Perusal only to
>the Unemployment of the indolent _Waiters_.
as I think may have come up in our earlier discussion, this is not
clearly the very same abstract nominal attested in the 1888 cite,
which represents the usual modern sense:
1888 Science XI. 192/1 The chief purpose of the inquiry was to
ascertain..the extent of unemployment generally.
In this case, _unemployment_ is a general condition for which
statistics can be computed, benefits offered, etc. In the 1717 cite,
it appears more to be a temporary state in which a particular
individual finds him/herself (akin to _idleness_). Are the two
really identical? Should the OED have two distinct listings for the
state and the societal phenomenon under the main entry? (I would say
More information about the Ads-l