Bill.Mullins at US.ARMY.MIL
Mon Nov 7 19:15:31 UTC 2005
> I'm not sure how many false positives you're going to get on
> a word like "gravitas." In any case, for a non-critical count
> like this one, couldn't it be accepted that the error rate
> would be relatively the same across the entire 1999-2005 period?
I dunno. It seems to me that everyone else (with the exception of the
fine folks on the ADS-L, wink) is getting stupider as time goes on. If
that's so, the error rate would increase . . . .
More information about the Ads-l