"infamous" = celebrated

Laurence Horn laurence.horn at YALE.EDU
Thu Apr 27 00:59:31 UTC 2006

At 6:31 AM -0800 3/14/06, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
>How, ye of little faith, explain ye this ?:
>   "To mark National Science Week, past winners of the most infamous
>prize in academia are touring the country to explain, among other
>things, the logic of making locusts watch repeated highlights of
>Star Wars and how ostriches fancy humans."
>   http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4801670.stm  (Today's BBC News.)
>   No, not the bugs and birds; I mean how do you explain "infamous"
>if not as a synonym for the now soooooo-boring "famous" ?  (Earlier
>discussion addressed the possibility that this "infamous" might only
>apply to celebrities or media things.)
>   The transformation appears to be complete. Let the Kaos begin !
You'll recall our discussion of this particular "infamous" cite of
Jon's, which we (most of us, anyway) agreed was within the pale
because the IgNobels really are awarded for meretricious, rather than
just plain meritorious, accomplishments in science.  But there is
definitely a widening or bleaching of "infamous" oozing our around
the edges.  A student essay I was reading this week referred to
Labov's "infamous Divergence Hypothesis" for AAVE/SAE, meaning (as
far as I can tell) well-known but controversial.  It's not quite a
simple synonym of "famous" yet, but it ain't what it used to be


The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

More information about the Ads-l mailing list