A beast, the lusetan or ounce?

Benjamin Zimmer bgzimmer at BABEL.LING.UPENN.EDU
Fri Jul 14 20:57:27 UTC 2006


Serves me right for not checking OED's "ounce, n.2". Thanks to
Charles, Jim, and Joel for the simultaneous corrections. (Everyone's
on top of their game as usual around here!)

--Ben


On 7/14/06, Joel S. Berson <Berson at att.net> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       "Joel S. Berson" <Berson at ATT.NET>
> Subject:      Re: A beast, the lusetan or ounce?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Except that "ounce" is an old and respected name for a lynx.  OED2,
> from 13..; and the often-quoted 1592 Shakespeare, Midsummer Night's
> Dream "Be it Ounce, or Catte, or Beare, Pard, or Boare with bristled haire."
>
> Joel
>
> At 7/14/2006 04:16 PM, you wrote:
> >On 7/14/06, Benjamin Zimmer <bgzimmer at ling.upenn.edu> wrote:
> >>On 7/14/06, Joel S. Berson <Berson at att.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > What word today is lusetan, as in "the beasts of the country are
> >> > bears, lusetans or ounces [etc.]", from 1720?
> >>
> >>OED gives "luseran" as a variant of "lucern", an archaic term for the lynx.
> >
> >So it would follow that "ounces" is a possible misprint/scanning error
> >for "lynces"/"linces".
> >
> >
> >--Ben Zimmer
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------
> >The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list