Joel S. Berson
Berson at ATT.NET
Fri Mar 28 15:32:17 UTC 2008
This intrigues me too -- is it a different view of society than I
would have expected from my small familiarity with the period?
At 3/28/2008 09:46 AM, George Thompson wrote:
>This passage seems to have thee difference senses of "blowing out",
>but what these senses are isn't at all clear.
> The Boston Artillery will attend the "blowing out"** ball
> at Manchester, N. H., March 19 (Monday.) On the next evening,
> 20th, there will be a grand ball at Lowell, on the occasion of the
> "blowing out." Pushee's band will be on hand as
> usual. [footnote] ** "Blowing out" means when the girls do not
> work by candle-light. [quoting a Boston newspaper]
> We have known "blowing out" balls in the interior of New
> Jersey before now, where the boys and girls, after blowing out the
> candles, continued "blowing out" until day-light. We thought the
> custom obsolete in New England, however.
> New York Daily Globe, March 12, 1849, p. 2, col. 4
>#3, what the boys and girls do in Jersey, seems to indicate a
>practice like bundling? In any event, there's a sexual
>association. The connection with "blowing out" is perhaps based on
>the sense of regaling one's self, treating one's self to a good time?
"Blowing out" - the 1842 "sucking"? (Not suggested seriously.) Did
bundling take place in New Jersey? I thought it was confined to New
England, and perhaps more common in Vermont than elsewhere. Or
perhaps in the Quaker areas of West Jersey?
>The Editor of the Globe I take it was put in mind of this sense by
>an apparent implication of the paragraph from the Boston paper. But
>I'm sure that the young men of the Boston Artillery were all most
>virtuous chaps, and don't believe that the balls in Manchester and
>Lowell were of the ballum rankum sort. (If you don't know what a
>ballum rankum is, ask Jonathan, Jonathon, or Captain Grose.) The
>expression perhaps has reference to a militia exercise, perhaps
>practice firing of artillery? And treating that as a major event by
>having a dance afterwards?
By 1842 militia musters had become objects of ridicule (I can supply
some references). Although I don't know how the "Boston Artillery"
(the "Ancient and Honorable" company?) would have been performing at
that time. Also, I would think artillery would not have been fired,
either then or in the 18th century -- the musters were often held on
town commons, with multitudes of spectators; and they were becoming
more disorderly, with accidents. Grenados, yes -- Sewall refers to
an accident in 1703, when a shell "broke", severely injuring
someone's hand. As for dances, the early 1800s were a period of a
Puritanical revival, with religious and civil authorities
discouraging dancing. (In 1810 Boston, a "masquerade ball" was
cancelled when the selectmen threatened legal action.) But
apparently the farmers' daughters (or were they immigrant Irishmen by
1842? Which is a little before the great flood of immigration)
working in the Lowell and Manchester mills were permitted balls --
unless these were high-society events whose sponsors had co-opted a
term from the working class?
>The definition of "blowing out" offered by the Boston paper doesn't
>help at all. The definition seems to me to connect to a labor
>demand. The girls working at the Lowell factories were pretty
>obstropulous at this time, and were perhaps refusing to work by
This is what I would infer from the article -- a straightforward
interpretation. But I have no other evidence.
>I don't see these senses in the OED, DARE, or the A-Man's
>dictionary, nor the O-Man's.
>GAT, who's baffled.
>George A. Thompson
>Author of A Documentary History of "The African Theatre",
>Northwestern Univ. Pr., 1998, but nothing much lately.
>The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l