Fw: [ADS-L] "slurring"?

Bill Palmer w_a_palmer at BELLSOUTH.NET
Sun Feb 22 17:20:06 UTC 2009


I hasten to classify myself as an "amateur", but one with a better than
average knowledge of language.

In my foreign language studies some (many) years ago, I recall phonetic
realizations varying according to speed and carefulness of articulation...a
phrase pronounced one way under conditions of careful speech, and maybe
another way with careless and/or rapid speech.

I will concede that this may be no longer precise or scientific enough.

However, I believe you understand the concept of what we are saying here, so
can you provide a more current or linguistically acceptable term?

Bill Palmer


----- Original Message -----
From: <ronbutters at AOL.COM>
To: <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 11:11 AM
Subject: Fw: [ADS-L] "slurring"?


> ---------------------- Information from the mail
> header -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       ronbutters at AOL.COM
> Subject:      Fw: [ADS-L] "slurring"?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> But "careless speech" is not a term that has any scientific basis or use.
> It explains nothing whatever.
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Palmer <w_a_palmer at BELLSOUTH.NET>
>
> Date:         Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:44:25
> To: <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Subject:      Re: [ADS-L] "slurring"?
>
>
> Altho I wasn't the first to use the term in this particular thread, let me
> substitute "careless speech"
>
> Bill Palmer
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <ronbutters at AOL.COM>
> To: <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 10:31 AM
> Subject: "slurring"?
>
>
>> ---------------------- Information from the mail
>> header -----------------------
>> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>> Poster:       ronbutters at AOL.COM
>> Subject:      "slurring"?
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> What do y'all mean by "slurring"? It refers informally to the speech of
>> the brain-damaged and drunks -- which is not a significant cause of
>> linguistic change.
>> ------Original Message------
>> From: Bill Palmer
>> Sender: ADS-L
>> To: ADS-L
>> ReplyTo: ADS-L
>> Subject: Re: [ADS-L] ADS-L Digest - 20 Feb 2009 to 21 Feb 2009 (#2009-53)
>> Sent: Feb 22, 2009 7:43 AM
>>
>> I do not doubt that it could have originated as a non-rhotic form of
>> "weren't", but it is now too widespread to be simply a result of
>> slurring,
>> IMHO.
>>
>> Bill P
>>
>> Original Message -----
>> From: "Your Name" <ROSESKES at AOL.COM>
>> To: <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 1:38 AM
>> Subject: Re: ADS-L Digest - 20 Feb 2009 to 21 Feb 2009 (#2009-53)
>>
>>
>>> ---------------------- Information from the mail
>>> header -----------------------
>>> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>>> Poster:       Your Name <ROSESKES at AOL.COM>
>>> Subject:      Re: ADS-L Digest - 20 Feb 2009 to 21 Feb 2009 (#2009-53)
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> In a message dated 2/22/2009 12:00:19 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>>> LISTSERV at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In North Carolina, where I live, and particularly in the eastern  part,
>>>>there
>>>>is a tendency to use "won't" to mean "was not" or "were  not".
>>>>Ex: Q: "Who ate that last piece of pie?"
>>>>     A: "It won't me".
>>>>
>>>>Does this practice exist  anywhere else? I have lived in and travelled
>>>>thru
>>>>much of the South,  and don't recall hearing it anywhere else.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds like a slurring between "it wasn't me" and "it weren't me," both
>>> of
>>> which I've heard.  Possible?
>>>
>>> Rosemarie
>>>
>>> I'm like a  roasted marshmallow: crusty on the outside, but a big softie
>>> on
>>> the  inside.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> **************You can't always choose whom you love, but you can choose
>>> how
>>> to find them. Start with AOL Personals.
>>> (http://personals.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntuslove00000002)
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list