300% decline

Joel S. Berson Berson at ATT.NET
Sat May 23 00:00:21 UTC 2009

At 5/22/2009 05:34 PM, Victor wrote:
>1) The person performing the calculations might have reversed the
>referent quantity, taking the final value as 100% instead of the
>initial. So the actual decline would have been 75%.

This is the simple-minded [sic] calculation I would assume, hearing
of a 300% decline.


The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

More information about the Ads-l mailing list