"let ourselves off the hook"?

Lisa Galvin lisagal23 at HOTMAIL.COM
Thu Feb 18 23:49:30 UTC 2010


 
Sorry, small correction:  rather than referring to a broken tenure system, he was referring to the issue of faculty mental health. Either way, he's afraid people will look at Amy Bishop's case as something so extreme that surely it's not a general problem.
 
It seems also that he should have said "...instead of using this..." rather than "...in using this.."

Lisa

                                                   



 

> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:40:33 -0800
> From: lisagal23 at HOTMAIL.COM
> Subject: Re: "let ourselves off the hook"?
> To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> 
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster: Lisa Galvin <lisagal23 at HOTMAIL.COM>
> Subject: Re: "let ourselves off the hook"?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> =20
> After several minutes of reading and re-reading this sentence (I admit it's=
> hard to parse)=2C I have come to the conclusion that the answer may lie in=
> his referral to the personal story of Amy Bishop. He is concerned that peo=
> ple will say she was an anomaly--i.e.=2C it was her fault for being "bizarr=
> e"=2C rather than admit that the university/tenure system is broken.
> 
> 
> Lisa Galvin =20
> 
> 
> 
> =20
> 
> > Date: Thu=2C 18 Feb 2010 18:18:56 -0500
> > From: Berson at ATT.NET
> > Subject: "let ourselves off the hook"?
> > To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> >=20
> > ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------=
> ------
> > Sender: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> > Poster: "Joel S. Berson" <Berson at ATT.NET>
> > Subject: "let ourselves off the hook"?
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
> ------
> >=20
> > David Yamada=2C director of the New Workplace Institute at Suffolk
> > University {Mass.] Law School=2C is quoted as saying "My concern is
> > that the increasingly bizarre nature behind Amy Bishop's personal
> > story may allow us to let ourselves off the hook in using this as a
> > wake-up call to take faculty mental health issues more
> > seriously." [Boston Globe=2C Feb. 18=2C 2010.]
> >=20
> > I can't make out the "let ourselves off the hook" here. My
> > interpretation of that phrase is that whatever event is being
> > referred to has enabled us to escape doing something. E.g.=2C "to
> > allow someone to escape from a difficult situation or to avoid doing
> > something that they do not want to do"=2C attributed to the Cambridge
> > Idioms Dictionary=2C 2nd ed.=2C 2006.
> >=20
> > Here Yamada seems to mean the reverse -- this case will *require* us
> > to pay attention to mental health issues.
> >=20
> > He can't be referring to a telephone being "off the hook" as meaning
> > the line has been engaged=2C something *is* being done? Seems unlikely
> > -- Yamada is saying the issue *needs* attention=2C not *is* being
> > attended to. (And anyway=2C no one at a "New Workplace" institute can
> > possibly be old enough to remember telephones attached by hooks to walls.=
> )
> >=20
> > Joel
> >=20
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
> =
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
                                          
------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list