OT: not "jazz (not music)--1911?"
Joel S. Berson
Berson at ATT.NET
Wed Sep 7 00:05:00 UTC 2011
At 9/6/2011 12:46 PM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
No I won't. In addition to the date confusion I mentioned, for the
three manuscripts that I'm wrestling with, plus a published book that
quotes from some manuscript, all supposedly copying the same original
letter, no two of the four are identical. Each copyist must have
changed (or misread/mistranscribed) some portion of the
original. (Actually, one of the four could be accurate, but I don't
believe even that.)
>About thirty years ago I came across a modern paperback reprint of one of
>those very same "Frank Merriwell" books with a copyright date of something
>As I began to examine it for slang, I soon discovered "chicken out," a
>quarter-century antedating! And, OMG, something like "kooky"! And, Great
>God Almighty, "cool"!
>Well, I'm not so dense that by that time I didn't catch on. While 99% of
>the text read exactly like a ca1915 publication, an evil editorial genius
>had quietly gone through and updated all the slang in the teen dialogue to
I once came across a one or two sentence quotation purported to have
been written in the 1650s by an about-20-year-old woman. It was out
of its time (what's the word here? Not "asynchronous".
"Incongruous"?) for the situation it described. After some
sleuthing, I was able to discover the published source, a diary
allegedly written by this young woman. I read the diary, and found,
like Jon, some words and phrasings that seemed to be too
early. After further sleuthing I found that a well-reputed professor
of history had written an article demonstrating that the diary was
"constructed" in the late 19th century.
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
More information about the Ads-l