mock-up

Spanbock/Svoboda-Spanbock spanbocks at VERIZON.NET
Fri Feb 8 02:24:03 UTC 2013


As I recall, I think we architects use the term 'mock-up' only if the representation being constructed is full-scale; hence, it is usually only a part of a building.

If I were constructing a smaller-scale building, or part of a building, I would call it a model.

--
Kate Svoboda-Spanbock


On Feb 5, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Dan Goncharoff wrote:

> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
> Poster:       Dan Goncharoff <thegonch at GMAIL.COM>
> Subject:      Re: mock-up
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Mock-ups are used by architects to show buildings that don't exist *yet*,
> and by archeologists to show buildings that don't exist *now*, but used to
> exist.
>
> I think the usage of mock-up is broader than your experience tells you.
>
> DanG
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
>> -----------------------
>> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>> Poster:       Jonathan Lighter <wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM>
>> Subject:      Re: mock-up
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Mock-ups, in my experience, are (usually smaller and non-functioning, or
>> not fully functional) complete models of machines like airplanes that don't
>> exist *yet.* An airplane mock-up, for example, is (or used to be) useful
>> for wind-tunnel tests.
>>
>> The novelty with Tricky Dick is that he was a person, not a thing; he *did*
>> exist once; and the model is only of his head, not the whole person.
>>
>> So that's strike three in the  inappropriateness game.
>>
>> JL
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Joel S. Berson <Berson at att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> ---------------------- Information from the mail header
>>> -----------------------
>>> Sender:       American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
>>> Poster:       "Joel S. Berson" <Berson at ATT.NET>
>>> Subject:      Re: mock-up
>>>
>>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> At 2/5/2013 07:35 AM, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
>>>> "A physical representation or reconstruction (of a human head)."
>>>>
>>>> That's what CNN's Christine Romans calls the plastic bust of Richard III
>>>> based upon his newly unearthed skull.
>>>
>>> I see the Richard III Society is trying to reconstruct him too.  He's
>>> younger-looking, less malevolent, and more smiley than the
>>> run-of-the-mill portraits.
>>>
>>>
>> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/now-we-can-see-his-face-the-next-step-of-the-richard-iii-discovery-story-8480958.html
>>>
>>> But the mock-up looks to me like it was influenced by Laurence Olivier.
>>>
>>> Joel
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list