[Ads-l] Nor is "co-signer. "Co-Sign" Not in OED

[Joel Berson]

But not "co-signer".  I think some catching up from the 19th century is needed. 
Joel
      From: David Barnhart <dbarnhart at HIGHLANDS.COM>
 To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU 
 Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 3:12 PM
 Subject: Re: [ADS-L] "Co-Sign" Not in OED
   
But _co-signatory_ is in.  Interesting!

-----Original Message-----
From: American Dialect Society [mailto:ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of
Shapiro, Fred
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 9:53 AM
To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: "Co-Sign" Not in OED

---------------------- Information from the mail header
-----------------------
Sender:      American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Poster:      "Shapiro, Fred" <fred.shapiro at YALE.EDU>
Subject:      "Co-Sign" Not in OED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

I see that the verb "co-sign" is not in OED, unless I'm missing it somewher=
e.  There are at least about 600,000 Google hits for it.

Fred Shapiro

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org