[Ads-l] "If English was good enough for Jesus..." (New Yorker, 1926)

Ben Zimmer bgzimmer at GMAIL.COM
Sun Sep 6 21:00:55 UTC 2015


We talked about variations on the line "If English was good enough for
Jesus..." back in 2004:

http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/ads-l/2004-November/043076.html

In a 2006 Language Log post, I rounded up examples that Barry Popik
and I had collected:

http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003084.html

At the time, the earliest known example of the "good enough for Jesus"
phrasing (as opposed to earlier variations involving St. Paul) was one
that appeared in the Apr. 27, 1927 Chronicle Telegram of Elyria, Ohio,
attributed to "a man in Arkansas" writing a "letter of denunciation"
to the Rockefeller Institute.

This item circulated in a number of newspapers, but the original
version evidently appeared in the Dec. 4, 1926 issue of The New
Yorker.

http://archives.newyorker.com/?i=1926-12-04#folio=026
The New Yorker, Dec. 4, 1926, p. 27, col. 3
Old English.
A gentleman connected with the Rockefeller Institute discloses that,
among hundreds of letters of denunciation received by the institution
during the past year was one from a man in Arkansas who took the view
that all this modern education is dangerous and that the new-fangled
practice of grounding preachers in Latin and Greek is especially
pernicious. They ought to be taught English, and only English, he
said, adding in conclusion, "If English was good enough for Jesus,
it's good enough for me."

(This was an anonymous item in the "Talk of the Town" section.)

--bgz

-- 
Ben Zimmer
http://benzimmer.com/

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org


More information about the Ads-l mailing list