[Ads-l] Has the Earliest Modern Usage of the Term "Science Fiction" Gotten Any Attention from Science Fiction Historians?

Jonathan Lighter wuxxmupp2000 at GMAIL.COM
Mon Jul 13 15:30:50 UTC 2020


Not a book of "science fiction," but a book of science *and* fiction.

JL

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:12 AM <dave at wilton.net> wrote:

> The genre predates the term.
>
> There are various claims to the "first" science fiction novel. Notable
> among them are:
>
> Margaret Cavendish's 1666 "The Blazing World"
> Mary Shelley's 1818 "Frankenstein"
>
> Cavendish's work might not be considered a novel, but it's clearly within
> the realm of what we know call "science fiction."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: American Dialect Society <ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> On Behalf Of
> Randy Alexander
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 7:40 AM
> To: ADS-L at LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADS-L] Has the Earliest Modern Usage of the Term "Science
> Fiction" Gotten Any Attention from Science Fiction Historians?
>
> Does that make Etidorhpa nominally the first science fiction novel? I read
> that in high school around 1980.
>
>
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org
>


-- 
"If the truth is half as bad as I think it is, you can't handle the truth."

------------------------------------------------------------
The American Dialect Society - http://www.americandialect.org



More information about the Ads-l mailing list