<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>Don't know how much I can contribute, but I'm hopeful that I can learn something from the discussion. I wasn't there to get Julie's paper on Sunday. Can I get a copy to look at, please?</div><div>Thanks, Stephanie</div><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><br><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Richard RHODES <rrhodes@BERKELEY.EDU><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> ALGONQUIANA@LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tue, October 30, 2012 8:52:23 PM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Continuing the morphology and
syntax discussion<br></font><br>
<p>Folks,</p>
<p>I'm just putting out a feeler to see if there is interest in continuing the syntax morphology discussion online.</p>
<p>It seemed like Julie Brittain's paper on Sunday morning put us right in the middle of it again, but half of the folks were already gone by then.</p>
<p>Let me know if it's worth talking in this venue.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Rich Rhodes</p>
<p>Richard A. Rhodes<br> Department of Linguistics<br> 1203 Dwinelle Hall #2650<br> University of California<br> Berkeley, 94720</p>
<p></p></div></div><div style="position:fixed"></div>
</div></body></html>
<p>