Arabic-L:LING:New Dissertation

[Dilworth Parkinson]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arabic-L: Tue 03 Sep 2002
Moderator: Dilworth Parkinson <dilworth_parkinson at byu.edu>
[To post messages to the list, send them to arabic-l at byu.edu]
[To unsubscribe, send message to listserv at byu.edu with first line
reading:
           unsubscribe arabic-l                                      ]

-------------------------Directory-------------------------------------

1) Subject:New Dissertation

-------------------------Messages--------------------------------------
1)
Date:  03 Sep 2002
From:reposted from LINGUIST
Subject:New Dissertation

Date:  Thu, 29 Aug 2002 06:16:40 +0000
From:  atmahmoud4 at yahoo.com
Subject:  Syntax: Mahmoud "A Comparative Study of Middle and Inchoative
Alternations in Arabic"


New Dissertation Abstract

Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 1989

Author: Abduljawad T. Mahmoud

Dissertation Title:
A Comparative Study of Middle and Inchoative Alternations in Arabic
and English

Linguistic Field: Syntax, Semantics
Subject Language: Arabic, Standard

Dissertation Director 1: Lori S Levin
Dissertation Director 2: Sarah G Thomason
Dissertation Director 3: Richard G Thomason


Dissertation Abstract:
	
This study presents a detailed analysis of the semantic, syntactic and
morphological features of the middle and inchoative (unaccusative)
alternations in Arabic and English. The issue of the middle/
unaccusative contrast and the question of whether middles constitute a
semantically and syntactically uniform class are also addressed. On
the basis of this analysis, a new typology of the middle and
unaccusative verbs in the two languages has been proposed.  In
addition to the semantic properties and the syntactic behavior of
these verbs, this typology is conditioned some contextual and
pragmatic factors.  The following are the main conclusions of this
study: (i) Given the class of the unmarked unaccusatives and the class
of the morphological intransitives, the morphological condition for
the formation of Arabic unaccusatives is neither necessary nor
sufficient.  (ii) Unlike English, Arabic does not have semantic or
syntactic restrictions analogous to those that distinguish the English
middles from unaccusatives.  (iii) The English verbs known in the
literature as middles do not constitute a semantically or
syntactically uniform class. (iv) Despite the fact that Arabic and
English are typologically different and genetically unrelated, the two
languages exhibit significant similarities with respect to the
semantic and syntactic properties of the middle and unaccusative
alternations.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
End of Arabic-L:  03 Sep 2002