<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Arabic-L: Fri 12 Nov 2010<br>Moderator: Dilworth Parkinson <<a href="mailto:dil@byu.edu">dil@byu.edu</a>><br>[To post messages to the list, send them to arabic-l@byu.edu]<br>[To unsubscribe, send message from same address you subscribed from to<br><a href="mailto:listserv@byu.edu">listserv@byu.edu</a> with first line reading:<br> unsubscribe arabic-l ]<br><br>-------------------------Directory------------------------------------<br><br>1) Subject: grammaticalization<br><br>-------------------------Messages-----------------------------------<br>1)<br>Date: 12 Nov 2010<br>From: Dan Parvaz <<a href="mailto:dparvaz@gmail.com">dparvaz@gmail.com</a>><br>Subject: grammaticalization<br><br><div>I had simply asked for the term for translation purposes. Thanks, incidentally, to all the contributors. Not only did I have a large selection from which to choose, I also picked up a few new reference works as well! Thanks again.</div><div><br></div><div>As long as we're on this, though, if we are going to pretend that Classical Arabic is the only language which hasn't undergone linguistic change diachronically (and the arguments against that, as David so eloquently wrote, are legion), that certainly isn't the case for spoken Arabics. The use of raaH as a future auxiliary, or "3am" as an present progressive marker are, among many others, plenty of evidence of grammaticization. </div><div><br></div><div>-Dan.</div><div><br></div>--------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>End of Arabic-L: 12 Nov 2010n</body></html>