CDA is NOT a method of critical discourse analysis

[Christopher Hart]

Here, here!

 

Though it is deeply frustrating that this still needs to be spelled out.  

 

 

 

From: critics-l-bounces at charlemagne.cddc.vt.edu
[mailto:critics-l-bounces at charlemagne.cddc.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Teun A. van
Dijk
Sent: 13 March 2013 13:36
To: critics-l at charlemagne.cddc.vt.edu
Subject: [Critics-l] CDA is NOT a method of critical discourse analysis

 


My apologies, I just realized the new site of EDiSo (www.aediso.org) is not
yet open for those who are not registered.

Here is the piece "CDA is NOT a method of critical discourse analysis" for
Critics-L subscribers


Teun
___________________________________________________
Teun A. van Dijk
Pompeu Fabra University 
Dept. of Translation and Language Sciences
138, Roc Boronat
08018 Barcelona, Spain
E-mail: vandijk at discourses.org
Web: www.discourses.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/critics-l/attachments/20130313/604bd1a6/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Critics-l mailing list
Critics-l at listserv.cddc.vt.edu
http://listserv.cddc.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/critics-l