<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"><BASE
href="file://C:\Archivos de programa\Archivos comunes\Microsoft Shared\Stationery\">
<STYLE>BODY {
BACKGROUND-POSITION: left top; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; BACKGROUND-REPEAT: no-repeat; FONT-FAMILY: Arial
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Hi,</DIV>
<DIV>I'd like to point out that some interesting findings in research on the
production of a discourse of resistance are the combinations (by individuals,
not necessarily a group considered as an aggregate) of ideological elements of
resistance with ideological elements of conformity to and appropriation of
dominant values. Some combinations can even be incongruent or incompatible
in the analyst's view. Another point is that individual variation
tends to be interesting and yield useful insights.</DIV>
<DIV>Here are a couple more references on those aspects:</DIV>
<DIV>Carranza, Isolda E. 1999 Winning the battle in private discourse:
rhetorical-logical operations in storytelling. <EM>Discourse & Society</EM>
10 (4), 509-541. </DIV>
<DIV>Carranza, Isolda E. 1998. Low-Narrativity Narratives and Argumentation.
<EM>Narrative Inquiry</EM> 8 (2), 287-317.</DIV>
<DIV>I'd love to read list-member's comments on their experience doing research
on resistance discourse in institutions.</DIV>
<DIV>Best,</DIV>
<DIV>Isolda</DIV>
<DIV>*****************************************************************************************<BR>Isolda
E. Carranza, Ph.D.<BR>Profesora Titular de Lingüística II. Facultad de
Lenguas.<BR>Investigadora de CONICET<BR>Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
Argentina<BR>******************************************************************************************<BR></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>