[Edling] ORCiD- write to journal editors with your feedback

Curry, Mary Jane mjcurry at Warner.Rochester.edu
Sat May 27 14:57:34 UTC 2017


Wayne, thanks for the summary. I have been replying to the same ŒHelen¹ at
TF that I won¹t review‹of course I can walk that back‹but I do think
editors can and should play a role here in pushing back on this
requirement. Not all top journals are published by these corporations so
we do have options about where to publish and whether or not to review.
Those of us who are in a position to be vocal about our concerns and to
withhold our free labor if necessary should be at the forefront of
challenging this imposition. Junior scholars are not likely to feel that
they can afford to do so. I hope anyone on the list who is editing a
journal that now Œrequires¹ ORCiD will make an attempt to engage T&F and
any other publishers who are pushing ORCiD down our throats as reviewers.

MJ

 -- 
Mary Jane Curry, PhD
Associate Professor
Warner Graduate School of Education
University of Rochester
474 LeChase Hall, 585.273.5934

Co-chair, UR Faculty Senate, 2016-17, 2017-18
Director, Warner Writing Support Services
Associate Editor, Brief Research Reports, TESOL Quarterly







On 5/27/17, 9:20 AM, "Edling on behalf of Wright, Wayne E"
<edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se on behalf of wewright at purdue.edu> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>
>
>I really appreciate this discussion and all the points that have been
>made.
>
>
>
>For the record, those of us who edit T&F journals received the same
>e-mail notification and instructions about ORCID from T&F as everyone
>else. We played no part in the decision. We are in the same boat as our
>authors and reviewers.
>
>
>
>While I see some value in the ORCID ID and appreciate the problems it
>attempts to address, I agree with the sentiments that ORCID should be
>optional. I also don¹t see any reason why reviewers should be required to
>registered. The letter I received simply said ³strongly encourage² to
>register, but we¹ll see if that later shifts to ³require.² While Journal
>editors have been given no choice in this matter, I will do my part to
>push back.
>
>
>
>My own experience so far with ORCID is that that once you register, you
>do have control over what publications are associated with your ID. One
>could easily create the ID and simply not link any of their current
>publications with it. Then one can make their own conscious decisions
>about submitting to journals or applying for grants that require it.
>
>
>
>I sincerely hope that while many of us share the concerns about what
>these rapid changes mean for the present and future of academic
>publishing, that we won¹t allow these changes to prevent us from engaging
>in the publishing process. The journals associated with the changes are
>among the top journals our fellow scholars need to publish in to get
>hired, make tenure, and earn promotions. Those of us in the language and
>education field are used to working within imperfect systems as we work
>to change them.
>
>
>
>Sincerely,
>
>
>
>Wayne
>
>
>
>--
>
>Wayne E. Wright, PhD
>
>Professor and Barbara I. Cook Chair of Literacy and Language
>
> 
>
>Purdue University
>
>College of Education
>
>Department of Curriculum & Instruction
>
>Beering Hall of Liberal Arts and Education, Room 4108
>
>100 N. University St.
>
>West Lafayette, IN 47907
>
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.education.purdue.
>edu_faculty-2Dprofiles_name_wayne-2Dwright_&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQ
>h5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=p
>ppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=AcrXC2qZwVn5IAtostBMF69T0aKss
>3zsHGcjFOvp8z0&e= 
>
>Editor, Journal of Southeast Asian American Education and Advancement
>(www.jsaaea.org 
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.jsaaea.org&d=DwIG
>aQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aL
>Z1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=FPox1
>uH8l5dEDjiv3IVUrrXb_D3h3LCW93iHOXJ6gLI&e= >)
>
>Co-Editor, Journal of Language, Identity, and Education
>(www.tandfonline.com/loi/hlie20
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.tandfonline.com_l
>oi_hlie20&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-P
>goc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28sxNM
>W_PsfmY0&s=TP6F-ZeJG5-wZYYiyXsNa9E5Q_7dw6ftavvCXjJioQs&e= >)
>
> 
>
>
>
>On 5/25/17, 7:01 PM, "Edling on behalf of Rita Elaine SILVER (ELL, CRPP)"
><edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se on behalf of rita.silver at nie.edu.sg>
>wrote:
>
>
>
>    Hi all
>
>    A very interesting discussion with lots to think about. On the
>practical side, I checked with a publisher's rep yesterday and here is
>what I found out:
>
>    1. Some T&F journals are 'requiring' registration; others are
>'recommending'. I've no idea how/who decided which journals would
>require/recommend.
>
>    2. This should be treated as a test period to see what the uptake is.
>Thus, an excellent time to speak up by writing to the journal editors
>(who may not be on this list).
>
>    
>
>    For myself, I am simply writing to journals editors to say:
>
>    
>
>    I am willing to continue to review for the journal but I am not in
>agreement with a policy that REQUIRES me to register for a separate
>database (i.e. ORCiD). When this requirement is change to a
>recommendation, optional for journal reviewers (as well as authors and
>others), I would be happy to work with you again.
>
>    
>
>    Regards
>
>    Rita
>
>    
>
>    -----Original Message-----
>
>    From: Edling [mailto:edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se] On Behalf Of
>edling-request at bunner.geol.lu.se
>
>    Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 4:41 AM
>
>    To: edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
>
>    Subject: Edling Digest, Vol 11, Issue 33
>
>    
>
>    Send Edling mailing list submissions to
>
>    	edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
>
>    
>
>    To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
>    
>	https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bunner.geol.lu.se_mai
>lman_listinfo_edling&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbO
>U&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKq
>QRGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=IuTmoI27xDwtYj1KmiVmjqs24H1CkCA3c8_Xjv2zmWo&e=
>
>    or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>
>    	edling-request at bunner.geol.lu.se
>
>    
>
>    You can reach the person managing the list at
>
>    	edling-owner at bunner.geol.lu.se
>
>    
>
>    When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Edling digest..."
>
>    
>
>    
>
>    Today's Topics:
>
>    
>
>       1. Re: ORCID: A Double-edged Sword? (Curry, Mary Jane)
>
>    
>
>    
>
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    
>
>    Message: 1
>
>    Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 17:38:00 +0000
>
>    From: "Curry, Mary Jane" <mjcurry at Warner.Rochester.edu>
>
>    To: MARTIN EDWARDES <martin.edwardes at btopenworld.com>, The Educational
>
>    	Linguistics List <edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>
>
>    Subject: Re: [Edling] ORCID: A Double-edged Sword?
>
>    Message-ID: <D54C8E77.384CF%mjcurry at warner.rochester.edu>
>
>    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
>    
>
>    Well, at least so far they aren?t asking us to pay for the wall/ORCiD
>access? :)
>
>    
>
>     --
>
>    Mary Jane Curry, PhD
>
>    Associate Professor
>
>    Warner Graduate School of Education
>
>    University of Rochester
>
>    474 LeChase Hall, 585.273.5934
>
>    
>
>    Co-chair, UR Faculty Senate, 2016-17, 2017-18 Director, Warner
>Writing Support Services Associate Editor, Brief Research Reports, TESOL
>Quarterly
>
>    
>
>    
>
>    
>
>    From: Edling 
><edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se>
>> on behalf of MARTIN EDWARDES
>><martin.edwardes at btopenworld.com<mailto:martin.edwardes at btopenworld.com>>
>
>    Reply-To: MARTIN EDWARDES
><martin.edwardes at btopenworld.com<mailto:martin.edwardes at btopenworld.com>>,
> Educational List 
><edling at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>>
>
>    Date: Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 10:57 AM
>
>    To: Educational List
><edling at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>>
>
>    Subject: Re: [Edling] ORCID: A Double-edged Sword?
>
>    
>
>    I think one of the reasons for this is the use of reviewers
>recommended by the author, which turn out to be the authors themselves in
>wig and glasses. I can see the point of a full international database
>which registers our academic existence and qualifications - the medical
>professions already have something like this. If T&F were working with
>professional and academic bodies to produce such a database, I would be
>all for it. But a unilateral attempt such as this, using a frankly
>primitive tool like Orcid - which is, in the end, just a list with no
>verification processes to assure its data - well, it's like trying to
>keep criminals out of the USA by building a wall in a desert. Doing
>something, anything, the first thing thought of, is usually not a
>solution.
>
>    
>
>    Martin
>
>    
>
>    
>
>    ________________________________
>
>    From: "Wright, Wayne E"
><wewright at purdue.edu<mailto:wewright at purdue.edu>>
>
>    To: The Educational Linguistics List
><edling at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>>
>
>    Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2017, 1:46
>
>    Subject: Re: [Edling] ORCID: A Double-edged Sword?
>
>    
>
>    Thanks Mary Jane! Will you guys have a session at AILA about this?
>
>    
>
>    -Wayne
>
>    
>
>    
>
>    Sent from my iPhone
>
>    
>
>    On May 24, 2017, at 6:47 PM, Curry, Mary Jane
><mjcurry at Warner.Rochester.edu<mailto:mjcurry at Warner.Rochester.edu>> wrote:
>
>    
>
>    Thanks, Wayne, Theresa Lillis and I have been documenting those kinds
>of evaluation regimes in Europe since 2004 and more recently in other
>regions (eg Latin America). If anyone wants references, let me know. We
>also have a Google Group as part of our AILA Research on Publishing and
>Presenting Research in a Global Context which is an open group:
>aila-pub-ren at googlegroups.com<mailto:aila-pub-ren at googlegroups.com>. All
>are welcome to join.
>
>    
>
>    Best
>
>    MJ
>
>    
>
>     --
>
>    Mary Jane Curry, PhD
>
>    Associate Professor
>
>    Warner Graduate School of Education
>
>    University of Rochester
>
>    474 LeChase Hall, 585.273.5934
>
>    
>
>    Co-chair, UR Faculty Senate, 2016-17, 2017-18 Director, Warner
>Writing Support Services Associate Editor, Brief Research Reports, TESOL
>Quarterly
>
>    
>
>    
>
>    
>
>    From: Edling 
><edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se>
>> on behalf of "Wright, Wayne E"
>><wewright at purdue.edu<mailto:wewright at purdue.edu>>
>
>    Reply-To: Educational List
><edling at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>>
>
>    Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 4:21 PM
>
>    To: Educational List
><edling at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>>
>
>    Subject: Re: [Edling] ORCID: A Double-edged Sword?
>
>    
>
>    Thanks Francis for raising this issue.
>
>    
>
>    We just learned recently of the ORCID requirement for contributors to
>our T&F journal. Journal editors were not consulted on this beforehand.
>
>    
>
>    While I see value in the points raised, I also feel the point is
>somewhat moot as anyone who engages in public scholarship today will have
>their work indexed by 3rd party indexes. One can opt out of ORCID or
>refuse to publish in journals that require it, but their work is going to
>show up in a Google search whether they like it or not, as well as any
>indexes (like ERIC or Ebsco) that journals use ,and that we scholars rely
>on to find each other?s work.
>
>    
>
>    The oppressive regimes of the past did not have Google or ORCID and
>yet seemed to have no problem identifying ?subservient? scholars.
>
>    
>
>    A broader question may be what is the value of conducting scholarship
>in the 21st Century if one?s work is not accessible to those it can
>benefit? And is it even possible to prevent the same work from being
>visible to those who may wish to use it for nefarious purposes? Is this a
>risk we need to be willing to take if we want to engage in the type of
>scholarship we do?
>
>    
>
>    One could argue that at the very least ORCID helps to disambiguate
>scholars so they are not falsely accused of authoring work by others with
>same or similar names.
>
>    
>
>    To me a larger and more immediate concern is the growing use and
>abuse of bibliometrics that these third-party repositories and indexes
>are enabling. Some institutions are going as far as giving 1 to 5 star
>ratings of their faculty based on bibliometrics ? despite the deep flaws
>of these measures and questions about what these metrics actually measure
>and mean. It?s the equivalent of the abusive practice of rating teachers
>based on value-added measures drawn from highly questionable student
>high-stakes test data. I just learned of a new book on this issue I am
>looking forward to reading:
>
>    
>
>    Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses Yves
>Gingras<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.co
>m_s_ref-3Ddp-5Fbyline-5Fsr-5Febooks-5F1-3Fie-3DUTF8-26text-3DYves-2BGingra
>s-26search-2Dalias-3Ddigital-2Dtext-26field-2Dauthor-3DYves-2BGingras-26so
>rt-3Drelevancerank&d=DwMGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&
>r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=TRco8Tk2Rz40daYb62YvvO3xNM
>RirzcvGGVAi0ActaY&s=uOjktPKR_R5NekcfhttgHUvB4zVq8BdH9IZ1wHtOyS4&e=>
>(Author) 
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_Biblio
>metrics-2DResearch-2DEvaluation-2DFoundations-2DInformation-2Debook_dp_B01
>LYQJ937_ref-3Dsr-5F1-5F1-3Fie-3DUTF8-26qid-3D1495656880-26sr-3D8-2D1-26key
>words-3Dbibliometrics-2Band-2Bresearch-2Bevaluation-2Buses-2Band-2Babuses&
>d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnT
>VAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s
>=Ftm0myouXupaXmBetECXb5gHKnCWq4_e_xbQ4ETAU4I&e=
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_Bibli
>ometrics-2DResearch-2DEvaluation-2DFoundations-2DInformation-2Debook_dp_B0
>1LYQJ937_ref-3Dsr-5F1-5F1-3Fie-3DUTF8-26qid-3D1495656880-26sr-3D8-2D1-26ke
>ywords-3Dbibliometrics-2Band-2Bresearch-2Bevaluation-2Buses-2Band-2Babuses
>&d=DwMGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUn
>TVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=TRco8Tk2Rz40daYb62YvvO3xNMRirzcvGGVAi0ActaY&
>s=jlTJZxYzHI3_zt3gdkjl866gwjI-aqaiaYfaG6zIucM&e=>
>
>    
>
>    Looking forward to hearing other?s thoughts on these issues!
>
>    
>
>    -Wayne
>
>    
>
>    --
>
>    Wayne E. Wright, PhD
>
>    Professor and Barbara I. Cook Chair of Literacy and Language
>
>    
>
>    Purdue University
>
>    College of Education
>
>    Department of Curriculum & Instruction
>
>    Beering Hall of Liberal Arts and Education, Room 4108
>
>    100 N. University St.
>
>    West Lafayette, IN 47907
>
>    
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.education.purdue.
>edu_faculty-2Dprofiles_name_wayne-2Dwright_&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQ
>h5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=p
>ppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=AcrXC2qZwVn5IAtostBMF69T0aKss
>3zsHGcjFOvp8z0&e= 
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.education.purdue
>.edu_faculty-2Dprofiles_name_wayne-2Dwright_&d=DwMGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpa
>Qh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=
>TRco8Tk2Rz40daYb62YvvO3xNMRirzcvGGVAi0ActaY&s=XTqLa5kH29n7pHh5rJ2ETqV3EFPi
>7jRLvyv3qV7Uiok&e=>
>
>    Editor, Journal of Southeast Asian American Education and Advancement
>(www.jsaaea.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.js
>aaea.org&d=DwMGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pg
>oc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=TRco8Tk2Rz40daYb62YvvO3xNMRirzcvGGVA
>i0ActaY&s=xAwssnaUpgfrFXtDZ0cqVYqfQb73FlLg0c7K8jZf4zA&e=>)
>
>    Co-Editor, Journal of Language, Identity, and Education
>(www.tandfonline.com/loi/hlie20<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u
>=http-3A__www.tandfonline.com_loi_hlie20&d=DwMGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5o
>fMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=TRco
>8Tk2Rz40daYb62YvvO3xNMRirzcvGGVAi0ActaY&s=PTfzkkWV88DgwFz1nhiDsX2_3qaO0cfl
>4Pt5_3KV1sY&e=>)
>
>    
>
>    
>
>    From: Edling 
><edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se>
>> on behalf of Francis Hult
>><francis.hult at englund.lu.se<mailto:francis.hult at englund.lu.se>>
>
>    Reply-To: The Educational Linguistics List
><edling at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>>
>
>    Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 3:26 PM
>
>    To: Edling Edling
><edling at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>>
>
>    Subject: [Edling] ORCID: A Double-edged Sword?
>
>    
>
>    Dear Edling colleagues,
>
>    
>
>    I received an e-mail today from a well known journal in our field.
>Several colleagues told me about receiving a similar letter in relation
>to other journals (all from Taylor & Francis).  It would seem like there
>is a movement taking place among a number of journals to shift from
>optional to required use of ORCID
>(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__orcid.org_&d=DwIGaQ&
>c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r
>8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=uvzmtcFA
>WwbDjOzvez65o9jdFIjTlE4V806SOD8t-68&e=
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__orcid.org_&d=DwMGaQ&
>c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r
>8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=TRco8Tk2Rz40daYb62YvvO3xNMRirzcvGGVAi0ActaY&s=fU6hZ2Xh
>p5C96G1smbHY_QVtE_btxlAmS_HtZIbAmpU&e=>) for authors and reviewers.  The
>Swedish Research Council already requires it for grant submissions.
>While there are a number of potential benefits, it would seem to me that
>there are also ethical and moral issues to consider when it comes to the
>close tracking of researchers.  The recent sociopolitical circumstances
>in Turkey, Hungary and Poland come to mind.  Not to mention, at the risk
>of invoking Godwin's Law, the violent oppression of researchers by the
>Nazi regime.
>
>    
>
>    While I would not wish to prevent anyone from using ORCID if they
>find it useful, I do find it troubling that journals would now require us
>to register in a third party database (even one managed by a purportedly
>benign non-profit organization) in order to author or review papers.  I
>wrote the letter below in response to the message I received (the name of
>the editor and journal have been redacted here).  I put the question to
>the members of the list: How do you feel about this?  Should there be a
>wider conversation about this among researchers and publishers?
>
>    
>
>    Best,
>
>    Francis
>
>    
>
>    ________________________________
>
>    
>
>    Dear _____,
>
>    
>
>    I am writing because I am deeply concerned about the move by _____ to
>require the use of ORCID.  I have long had strong ethical concerns about
>third party organizations, even a non-profit with a purportedly benign
>objective, developing databases and repositories of scholars.  There can
>be any number of unintended consequences of creating such a repository,
>not least related to their potential sociopolitical misuse.  One can look
>historically to the Nazi regime in the 1930s and 40s and their aggressive
>oppression of Jewish scholars and other academics doing 'dangerous'
>research or even more recently to the Trump administration seeking out
>scholars who are doing climate research that does not align with its
>political objectives.  In our own field of bi-/multilingualism, it is not
>too far of a leap to imagine that ultra-nationalist parties may gain
>control in certain European countries and seek out for sanction
>researchers who do work on plurilingualism and multiculturalism.  There
>is a real danger that repositories like ORCID could more easily
>facilitate such academic oppression.
>
>    
>
>    In addition, in the information age and the rise of 'big data',
>information privacy and security is no small matter.  While an
>organization such as ORCID has seemingly good intentions at this time, we
>are nonetheless contributing to a database of personal/professional data
>in order to participate.  We thus give control of this information over
>to an organization that may use it in the future with unpredictable and
>unintended consequences:
>
>    
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theatlantic.com_m
>agazine_archive_2015_11_if-2Dyoure-2Dnot-2Dparanoid-2Dyoure-2Dcrazy_407833
>_&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqU
>nTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0
>&s=dmnDVYPFzzmgp0ffzYZsZZeRU-Bm6T3jY_wkI2hwMVY&e=
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theatlantic.com_
>magazine_archive_2015_11_if-2Dyoure-2Dnot-2Dparanoid-2Dyoure-2Dcrazy_40783
>3_&d=DwMGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWq
>UnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=TRco8Tk2Rz40daYb62YvvO3xNMRirzcvGGVAi0Acta
>Y&s=FaAuDqqevx9V-WCORtDuzIWCzApyVtjcVw-8Pq37vbM&e=>
>
>    
>
>    There is an internet adage that "if you are not the client, you are
>the product."  This has become apparent for several popular academic
>repositories that employ user-submitted information and materials for
>their own objectives:
>
>    
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.discovermagazine
>.com_crux_2017_02_01_who-2Disnt-2Dprofiting-2Doff-2Dthe-2Dbacks-2Dof-2Dres
>earchers_-23.WSWrMo21upo&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZ
>hHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNe
>gjKqQRGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=FdA9T3JWDpHo0lQssSX35yLaV8es6v3ePBe1NHxm3Zc&e=
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blogs.discovermagazin
>e.com_crux_2017_02_01_who-2Disnt-2Dprofiting-2Doff-2Dthe-2Dbacks-2Dof-2Dre
>searchers_-23.WSWrMo21upo&d=DwMGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQ
>ZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=TRco8Tk2Rz40daYb62Y
>vvO3xNMRirzcvGGVAi0ActaY&s=dCOwu75EcwNqPsDAPLQB1qodSOOxfbx002Y6L4Y_9Ug&e=>
>
>    
>
>    While many researchers today opt in to repositories such as
>Academia.edu<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__academia.
>edu_&d=DwMFaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9I
>WqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=BgCGKe5OjfKMZdm54AMji6QJ_FCHm_xe3paBDFoF
>jzE&s=AarZoxlFvrru80Cox0cw9E4enFnh3-rhSVBaXFJFSHw&e=>, ResearchGate,
>Google Scholar, or ORCID, others have chosen not to for ethical and moral
>reasons.  Perhaps they are concerned about privacy, big data, and
>potential future (mis)use of information.  Perhaps they do not wish to
>facilitate easy tracking of research by certain government regimes or
>radicals.  While published research is publicly available, regimes have
>in the past at least been required to create their own repositories of
>'dangerous' scholars.
>
>    
>
>    There are no doubt potential benefits of contemporary research
>repositories, but there are potential dangers as well.  It should be the
>choice of individual scholars to participate in them or not.  When a
>journal like___forces a researcher to participate in ORCID, we are faced
>with the dilemma of comprising our moral and ethical values or being
>excluded from the journal's academic community.  It is a bargain that I
>would rather not to have to strike.
>
>    
>
>    I implore the editorial leadership of _____ to make the use of ORCID
>optional for authors and reviewers.
>
>    
>
>    Yours sincerely,
>
>    Francis Hult
>
>    
>
>    --
>
>    Francis M. Hult, PhD
>
>    Associate Professor
>
>    Centre for Languages and Literature
>
>    Lund University
>
>    
>
>    Web: 
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sol.lu.se_en_perso
>n_FrancisHult&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rM
>j7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28
>sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=uM0OA3_Nk6OE3_HNTVv_u1zFv7DRDMvc0h3lsw2aT0g&e=
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__webmail.lu.se_owa_re
>dir.aspx-3FSURL-3DEpnktrfB15IHPeIrBHQoeWbPqDJ0e0hlxBDhQUiAxeAZw3-2DCx0LTCG
>gAdAB0AHAAOgAvAC8AdwB3AHcALgBzAG8AbAAuAGwAdQAuAHMAZQAvAGUAbgAvAHAAZQByAHMA
>bwBuAC8ARgByAGEAbgBjAGkAcwBIAHUAbAB0AA..-26URL-3Dhttp-253a-252f-252fwww.so
>l.lu.se-252fen-252fperson-252fFrancisHult&d=DwMGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5
>ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=TRc
>o8Tk2Rz40daYb62YvvO3xNMRirzcvGGVAi0ActaY&s=3g4MZTa90RzCzN7FrqxSWk8imQuYumB
>OifL0UqNJi7Y&e=>
>
>    
>
>    Editor, Educational Linguistics book series
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.springer.com_serie
>s_5894&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc
>9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28sxNMW_P
>sfmY0&s=eALACg5LdLJG-di9UZObYpN_GCgWsYi43Mqm3s-P0ps&e=
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.springer.com_seri
>es_5894&d=DwMGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgo
>c9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=TRco8Tk2Rz40daYb62YvvO3xNMRirzcvGGVAi
>0ActaY&s=Jv9Kq0TVaHB2o6rKZ3KPn0iVdr5CocyKjcqbjbKKgFI&e=>
>
>    
>
>    Co-editor, Contributions to the Sociology of Language book series
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.degruyter.com_view
>_serial_16644&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rM
>j7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28
>sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=gpAFUBQL4huRQZ_jsAdzb3iVw7KodBr35S-w71EoS3I&e=
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.degruyter.com_vie
>w_serial_16644&d=DwMGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_r
>Mj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=TRco8Tk2Rz40daYb62YvvO3xNMRirz
>cvGGVAi0ActaY&s=M2pje8mgv6sIgBEQdaTuWJgqOYW3HP1JQSbmCWOASts&e=>
>
>    
>
>    Recent Book:Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A
>Practical Guide 
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.wiley.com_WileyCDA
>_WileyTitle_productCd-2D1118308395.html&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5of
>MHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor
>2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=hv3dDGn-Hz_poI4AmeurqvzQRnqoqWnnF
>81BPv18bcM&e= 
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.wiley.com_WileyCD
>A_WileyTitle_productCd-2D1118308395.html&d=DwMGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5o
>fMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=TRco
>8Tk2Rz40daYb62YvvO3xNMRirzcvGGVAi0ActaY&s=goVF-JM9jlgeQr8BAZ938uR-54M74Q-h
>3mW6Q57GqJQ&e=>
>
>    
>
>    _______________________________________________
>
>    Edling mailing list
>
>    Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>
>
>    
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bunner.geol.lu.se_mail
>man_listinfo_edling&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU
>&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQ
>RGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=IuTmoI27xDwtYj1KmiVmjqs24H1CkCA3c8_Xjv2zmWo&e=
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bunner.geol.lu.se_mai
>lman_listinfo_edling&d=DwMFaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbO
>U&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=BgCGKe5OjfKMZdm54AMji6QJ
>_FCHm_xe3paBDFoFjzE&s=-ha_3jjye91P_0GEAiu80vWGxpMAh0CicfPgI6HJoLA&e=>
>
>    _______________________________________________
>
>    Edling mailing list
>
>    Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>
>
>    
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bunner.geol.lu.se_mail
>man_listinfo_edling&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU
>&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQ
>RGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=IuTmoI27xDwtYj1KmiVmjqs24H1CkCA3c8_Xjv2zmWo&e=
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bunner.geol.lu.se_mai
>lman_listinfo_edling&d=DwMFaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbO
>U&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=BgCGKe5OjfKMZdm54AMji6QJ
>_FCHm_xe3paBDFoFjzE&s=-ha_3jjye91P_0GEAiu80vWGxpMAh0CicfPgI6HJoLA&e=>
>
>    
>
>    
>
>    -------------- next part --------------
>
>    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
>    URL: 
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bunner.geol.lu.se_mai
>lman_private_edling_attachments_20170525_117e17ea_attachment.html&d=DwIGaQ
>&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1
>r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=kFveUoy
>jbsOBCAyYb34f80ymB4JuNIyIP2QgcsrVf0w&e= >
>
>    
>
>    ------------------------------
>
>    
>
>    Subject: Digest Footer
>
>    
>
>    _______________________________________________
>
>    Edling mailing list
>
>    Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
>
>    
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bunner.geol.lu.se_mail
>man_listinfo_edling&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU
>&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQ
>RGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=IuTmoI27xDwtYj1KmiVmjqs24H1CkCA3c8_Xjv2zmWo&e=
>
>    
>
>    
>
>    ------------------------------
>
>    
>
>    End of Edling Digest, Vol 11, Issue 33
>
>    **************************************
>
>    National Institute of Education (Singapore)
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.nie.edu.sg&d=DwIGa
>Q&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ
>1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQRGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=R0TmzI
>1u7NxFcK4BeRINblY7M0tuhzEWmvf2gTglqgI&e=
>
>    
>
>    DISCLAIMER : The information contained in this email, including any
>attachments, may contain confidential information.
>
>    This email is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) listed
>above. Unauthorised sight, dissemination or any other
>
>    use of the information contained in this email is strictly
>prohibited. If you have received this email by fault, please
>
>    notify the sender and delete it immediately.
>
>    
>
>    _______________________________________________
>
>    Edling mailing list
>
>    Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
>
>    
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bunner.geol.lu.se_mail
>man_listinfo_edling&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU
>&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQ
>RGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=IuTmoI27xDwtYj1KmiVmjqs24H1CkCA3c8_Xjv2zmWo&e=
>
>    
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Edling mailing list
>Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bunner.geol.lu.se_mail
>man_listinfo_edling&d=DwIGaQ&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU
>&r=_rMj7-Pgoc9IWqUnTVAZ6aLZ1r8V9PaRLjSW-DQVx4E&m=pppor2ghEGjkS-xUYmNegjKqQ
>RGhZ28sxNMW_PsfmY0&s=IuTmoI27xDwtYj1KmiVmjqs24H1CkCA3c8_Xjv2zmWo&e= 

_______________________________________________
Edling mailing list
Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling




More information about the Edling mailing list