<DIV>Bernard,</DIV>
<DIV>A clarification question: are you saying that it IS easy to persuade multilingual immigrants that monolinguism in English is good, or were you questioning whether it is or isn't?</DIV>
<DIV>Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV>-Maureen<BR><BR><B><I>Bernard Spolsky <spolsb@mail.biu.ac.il></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">But going in the other directions, it seems quiet quick to persuade the<BR>children of multilingual immigrants that monolingualism in English is a good<BR>thing? And universities? How many universities in English speaking<BR>countries demand that their students have serious foreign language<BR>proficiency?<BR>Bernard<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: owner-edling@ccat.sas.upenn.edu<BR>[mailto:owner-edling@ccat.sas.upenn.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Hudson<BR>Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 1:31 PM<BR>To: edling@ccat.sas.upenn.edu<BR>Subject: [EDLING:199] Re: L2 in US Schools<BR><BR><BR>Dear Bernard,<BR>I see what you mean. Sure - changing attitudes is a major challenge, and <BR>one thing is clear: it takes time. Probably measured in generations rather <BR>than years. And another thing: it takes concerted action across the board, <BR>not just concentrated in schools. Universi!
ties have
a major role in this, <BR>as the trainers of future teachers.<BR>Best wishes, Dick<BR><BR>At 11:15 14/05/2004, you wrote:<BR>>I was certainly impressed by the activity, but it is a very <BR>>bureaucratic public relations type site. I continue to wonder if <BR>>anyone has found a way to change public beliefs. Or, obviously, the <BR>>belief of teachers that it is worth becoming FL teachers. Our local <BR>>director general had a simple answer: surely any primary teacher can <BR>>teach all the English that primary children need! Seriously, how might <BR>>one go about establishing (or re-establishing) the valuing of <BR>>multilingualism in monolingual societies? Bernard<BR>><BR>>-----Original Message-----<BR>>From: owner-edling@ccat.sas.upenn.edu <BR>>[mailto:owner-edling@ccat.sas.upenn.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Hudson<BR>>Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 11:01 AM<BR>>To: edling@ccat.sas.upenn.edu<BR>>Subject: [EDLING:197] Re: L2 in US
Schools<BR>><BR>><BR>>Dear Bernard,<BR>>Thanks. I'm surprised it struck you that way. I don't know about <BR>>attracting and persuading since I've not looked at it from that point <BR>>of view. You may well be right. The main function is to report <BR>>activity, of which as you say there's quite a lot. All I can say is <BR>>that FL have much higher profile now than they did a few years ago, and <BR>>that there are quite a lot more resources for it and a clearer plan. <BR>>The resources for FL are far less than for literacy, and may not be <BR>>enough to turn the situation round. The planning is generally good. The <BR>>main block is the supply of teachers, which has very little hope of <BR>>hitting the target of one FL teacher per primary school by 2010.<BR>> Best wishes, Dick<BR>><BR>>At 04:04 14/05/2004, you wrote:<BR>> >Dick<BR>> >I looked quickly at the site, and was impressed by it verbiage (and <BR>> >s!
pelling
mistakes). There is plenty of activity. But who will it <BR>> >attract? Or convince? Bernard<BR>> ><BR>> >-----Original Message-----<BR>> >From: owner-edling@ccat.sas.upenn.edu <BR>> >[mailto:owner-edling@ccat.sas.upenn.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Hudson<BR>> >Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 11:05 PM<BR>> >To: edling@ccat.sas.upenn.edu<BR>> >Subject: [EDLING:193] Re: L2 in US Schools<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> >Much the same debate has been going on for some time in the UK, <BR>> >because of similar problems in our education system. In fact, it's <BR>> >very easy to see that the situation has got worse in the last ten <BR>> >years - fewer 16-year olds opting for languages in the last two years <BR>> >of school, fewer going on to university to study languages (with <BR>> >disastrous effects on language depts at university), and (therefore) <BR>> >fewer graduates training as language teac!
hers, so
fewer (and worse) <BR>> >language teachers in school, so fewer 16-year olds opting for <BR>> >languages .... But the government (whose head, incidentally, can <BR>> >speak fluent French) is trying hard to reverse the trend. There's <BR>> >quite a lot of information about what they're doing at<BR>http://www.dfes.gov.uk/languages/.<BR>> > Incidentally, one interesting fact that's emerged from the <BR>> >various inquiries into the problem has been that the Republic of <BR>> >Ireland, which (of<BR>> >course) is also an English-speaking country, does not have the same <BR>> >problem. With a tenth of our population, they have the same number of <BR>> >school-leavers specialising in languages. (But more recently, I'm <BR>> >told, the rot has been setting in, which is disappointing.) So much <BR>> >for the argument that our national unconcern about foreign languages <BR>> >is the inevitable consequence of!
the
dominance of English.<BR>> > Dick Hudson<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> >At 19:07 13/05/2004, you wrote:<BR>> > >Well, although we don't have these expectations in the foreign <BR>> > >language classroom--the question is why (as B. Spolsky mentioned as <BR>> > >well<BR>>on the<BR>> > >listserv). Why is it seemingly unimportant for a country that has so<BR>> > >many immigrant populations to be fluent in those other languages? <BR>> > >Why are Spanish-English dual language programs so stigmatized? Why <BR>> > >is multilingualism not seen as an asset in the hiring process (for <BR>> > >some it is--but not categorically)? I would like to live to see <BR>> > >the day when we have a leader who is educated enough to respond in <BR>> > >French and then translate his response for the other reporters. <BR>> > >That'll be the day.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >At AAAL!
, I was
struck by one presentation in particular that began <BR>> > >in the speaker's mother tongue. She mentioned how important it was <BR>> > >to align herself with her country and culture by beginning this <BR>> > >way. Although she had to present her paper in English--it was <BR>> > >important that she make the listeners aware of how this English <BR>> > >presentation affects how she is viewed within her own culture. A <BR>> > >growning, "required" English fluency worldwide may be what is <BR>> > >happening, but that doesn't make it right.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >So we come back to how to really start changing these long-held <BR>> > >ideologies. In a globalizing world--is it not better to make <BR>> > >relations more close by showing alliance through language learning <BR>> > >and fluency?<BR>> > ><BR>> > >-Maureen (Mo)<BR>> > ><BR>> > >"Haro!
ld F.
Schiffman" <HAROLDFS@CCAT.SAS.UPENN.EDU>wrote: I think <BR>> > >Leo VanLier identifies some of the issues that are crucial here. <BR>> > >American linguistic culture just doesn't have the expectations and <BR>> > >values about "foreign" language learning that others, do.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >He says: d) as part of a successful education, everyone was <BR>> > >expected to succeed in language classes. [and] If there is one <BR>> > >ingredient that stands out in my mind it is EXPECTATIONS. It was <BR>> > >simply expected that an educated person spoke the three foreign <BR>> > >languages....<BR>> > ><BR>> > >American linguistic culture doesn't have these expectations, and <BR>> > >constantly denigrates them. Did people notice what happened a while <BR>> > >back when a reporter at a press conference held by GWB asked the <BR>> > >French ambassador (foreign mi!
nister,
whatever) a question in <BR>> > >French? GWB went ballistic, chewed out the reporter, castigated <BR>> > >him, mocked him, ridiculed him. Sure taught him a lesson!<BR>> > ><BR>> > >So much for the value of language learning, and using it <BR>> > >appropriately.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >H. Schiffman<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > >Do you Yahoo!?<BR>> > >Yahoo! Movies - <BR>> > ><HTTP: movie?mid="1808405861" showtimes movies.yahoo.com>Buy advance <BR>> > >tickets for 'Shrek 2'<BR>> ><BR>> >Dick (Richard) Hudson, FBA<BR>> >Dept of Phonetics and Linguistics,<BR>> >University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT<BR>> >020 7679 3152; fax 020 7383 4108; <BR>> >www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dick/home.htm<BR>><BR>>Dick (Richard) Hudson, FBA<BR>>Dept of Phonetics and Linguistics,<BR>>University College London, Gower Street, London W!
C1E
6BT<BR>>020 7679 3152; fax 020 7383 4108; www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dick/home.htm<BR><BR>Dick (Richard) Hudson, FBA<BR>Dept of Phonetics and Linguistics,<BR>University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT<BR>020 7679 3152; fax 020 7383 4108; www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dick/home.htm <BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p>
<hr size=1><font face=arial size=-1>Do you Yahoo!?<br><a href="http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=24311/*http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/">SBC Yahoo!</a> - Internet access at a great low price.