<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:10pt;color:#000000;font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;" dir="ltr">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Imagining Multilingual TESOL Revisited: Where are we now?<br>
<div>
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr" style="font-size:10pt; color:#000000; font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<div><br>
Tove Skutnabb-Kangas</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>At TESOL 2008 I asked: “What can TESOL do in order not to participate in crimes against humanity? What is TESOL doing?” Read my short conclusion from 2008. I could just repeat it, because my reply now, in 2019, is: “In practice, there has been very little
change”. What I say will be a shock to many of you. Reflect hard on the message before you shoot the messanger. Remember that this almost 80 years old messenger has researched, and reflected on this for a life-time. Teaching and learning English is part and
parcel of formal education that should support children in increasingly many parts of the world to become minimally bilingual, preferably multilingual. If TESOL only supports the English part of this multilingualism, you may and mostly are participating in
linguistic and cultural genocide. I am here concerned with ITM children. ITM stands for Indigenous/Tribal, Minority and Minoritized/Marginalized children; this also includes immigrant and refugee minorities. According to UNESCO, 2019, around 40% of the children
who attend elementary school in the world (and many don’t) are not taught in a language that they understand. This language that they do NOT understand, if often, but of course not always, English. What does solid research, and educational, linguistic, pedagogical,
psychological, sociological and political science argumentation tell us? If ITM children are educated using a dominant language such as English, as the main teaching language, in a submersion or even early-exit transitional programme, this prevents access
to education because of the linguistic, pedagogical and psychological barriers it creates. Thus it violates the human right to education.
<br>
<br>
Video:<br>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lG-bW7oWErE</div>
<br>
<p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>