Fwd: Re: ELL: Tr : arsclist how to archive your language and other matters
xernaut at YAHOO.COM
Fri Oct 20 07:53:11 UTC 2000
>A couple of comments on the various media.
>Firstly, I'm surprised that anyone is recommending reel-to-reel. There is
>a big problem with older archival materials in this format that the tape
>becomes brittle over time; it's probably less of a problem with tapes made
>now than it is with reels over 50 years old but it's still a major
>drawback and a reason why many institutions (such as the National Film and
>Sound Archive in Australia) are converting reels to other media
>Anything magnetic (like conventional audio tapes) will get demagnetised
>over time and is not a good 'permanent' medium.
>Re digital deterioration: The most common cause of CD deterioration is the
>CD getting scratches. Computer hard drives build up errors because of the
>constant read-write that's going on during processing. This doesn't happen
>when a CD-ROM is played because it's read-only; the only equivalent of the
>'write' that happens to a hard drive is if the grooves get dirty or
>scratched. There's also physical deterioration of the metal, but I think
>after the scare of corroding CDs in Germany in the early 90s the
>manufacturers have fixed that problem, at least for the time being.
>Another point to consider is retrieving items off the tape/cd/reel. It's
>easy to tag the beginning of a segment on a CD (it's just a new track) and
>so it's very easy to retrieve individual stories, whereas for tapes and
>reels it's necessary to cue the tape and have a detailed audition sheet
>and so on.
>I'd go with DAT and minidiscs, with a paper copy (acid-free paper) of
>transcriptions as another backup. It's easy to transfer these between
>other media (eg DAT to magnetic audio cassette).
>If all else fails, there's charcoal ink and papyrus buried in sand in a
>warm and dry climate, but it makes information retrieval a bit hard...
>Best wishes for your project!
>>Christian PERROTEAU wrote:
>>>De : Brian Levy <xernaut at yahoo.com>
>>>À : ARSCLIST at galileo.cc.rochester.edu
>>>Objet : arsclist how to archive your language and other matters
>>>Date : Lun 16 oct 2000 1:45
>>>>I would like to introduce myself. My name is Brian Levy, and I work
>>>>with the Caddo Indian Tribe of Oklahoma as a Cultural Preservation
>>>>Activist (for wont of a better title to describe my job). Basically I
>>>>am helping the tribe create a permanent archive of songs, dances, oral
>>>>history in English, and, quite importantly, since the tribe is down to
>>>>only about twenty fluent speakers of the language now, we are recording
>>>>to DAT all manner of Caddo language, including stories, monologues,
>>>>prayers, conversation, etc. We are creating a master archive of Caddo
>>>>audio materials, recording older analog recordings on reel to reel and
>>>>analog cassette, to CD directly, and copying all DAT tapes made since
>>>>we began using DAT two years ago, also to CD. We make on blue dye copy
>>>>on Mitsui media (home audio type, not CDR computer type, using a Harmon
>>>>Kardon CDR2 machine, we also make one gold dye Kodak CD home audio copy
>>>>for a second copy of our archive housed at a archive in Oklahoma. A
>>>>third copy is also made on the same Mitsui blue dye (silver) CD's. We
>>>>may soon switch to just using computer CDR's instead of the home audio
>>>>type, since Tascam makes a machine for under 100 dollars which is high
>>>>quality and recommended. I consult with others doing similar work to
>>>>this, and I am on this and other lists. I am trying to determine the
>>>>archivability of this strategy. We have 110 CD's so far, and no stop
>>>>in sight, as we have tons of analog recordings to migrate, and are
>>>>constantly making new DAT recording.
>>>>We have a huge quantity of old Beta, VHS, Hi8, Super8, and now we use
>>>>Sony TCR-320 Digital 8 cams for all videoing of elders and dances. We
>>>>are waiting to know what is best for permanent archivability for
>>>>these. I am guessing DVD-Rom burners, as opposed to DVD-Ram or
>>>>such. But listening to some of your pros on these list servers, I am
>>>>wondering. We do not have the budget to buy equipment costing 50k now,
>>>>we are very limited on budget, though we might could get a grant to use
>>>>I am just wondering what any of your folks also concerned with
>>>>permanent archivability of precious materials, both audio and video,
>>>>would have to say on our situation. I would appreciate some advice.
>>>>Some have suggested computer hard drive storage. Some have said (such
>>>>as the Getty Museum in LA, and the Library of Congress, that no current
>>>>digital medium is considered archival. Only old reel to reel tapes
>>>>quarter inch, are considered time safe. Since who knows, they argue,
>>>>if any CD players will even be available in 500 years, whereas due to
>>>>the wide use of reel to reel all during twentieth century by broadcast
>>>>media etc, it will still be playable. Plus when audio tapes
>>>>deteriorate on analog reel to reel they gradually degrade in quality at
>>>>playback, whereas, once digital degrades too far, the machines can no
>>>>longer decipher the one's and zero's and play the CD back at all.
>>>>I know this is a long posting, but I wanted to introduce myself and the
>>>>work we are doing at the Caddo tribe, and hopefully get some guidance
>>>>from some more technically savvy folk...
>>>> Brian Levy
>>>>Kiwat Hasinay Foundation:
>>>>Preserving Caddo Heritage
>>>>211 W. Colorado Ave.
>>>>Anadarko, OK 73005 USA
>Department of Linguistics
>305 Boylston Hall
>Cambridge MA 02138
>ph: (+1) 617-547-3521
>fax: (+1) 617-496-4447
>Endangered-Languages-L Forum: endangered-languages-l at carmen.murdoch.edu.au
>Web pages http://carmen.murdoch.edu.au/lists/endangered-languages-l/
>Subscribe/unsubscribe and other commands: majordomo at carmen.murdoch.edu.au
Kiwat Hasinay Foundation:
Preserving Caddo Heritage
211 W. Colorado Ave.
Anadarko, OK 73005 USA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Endangered-languages-l