forward and backward priming

Michiel Spape Michiel.Spape at nottingham.ac.uk
Tue Mar 30 10:08:53 UTC 2010


Hi Leylo,
No problem, looking back on it, I thought it was actually a bit overly snarky in my way of putting it so I'm happy you didn't take it as such. Still, I didn't see the design as overly complicated (though only from a programming point of view, statistically, it sounds like a beast to analyse), it's just that no problem as such was stated! Good thing the lack of problem was solved anyway :)
Cheers,
Mich

Michiel Spapé
Research Fellow
Perception & Action group
University of Nottingham
School of Psychology


-----Original Message-----
From: e-prime at googlegroups.com [mailto:e-prime at googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of leylo
Sent: 29 March 2010 16:54
To: E-Prime
Subject: Re: forward and backward priming

Hi Michiel,

I already solve the problem.
It's really unbelievable, but right after that I read  my post, I knew
what I'm supposed to do.
I think that the problem was in the description of experiment that I
was given..... it was so complicated and incomplete , that I myself
couldn't understand what should I do....
Anyway, thank you so much for your reply, and for your analogies that
always make me laugh :-)

Thanks

On Mar 29, 12:52 pm, Michiel Spape <Michiel.Sp... at nottingham.ac.uk>
wrote:
> Hi Leylo,
> Your design seems clear enough, but... What exactly is the problem? It sounds a bit like you're asking 'how do I make my experiment in e-prime', which might require more of the casual or regular list-reader than they are willing to give. Compare this to writing to the cubase (a well-known music composition / production, etc software package) mailinglist, asking 'I have a problem: I want to write a jazzy song in 120 bpm that is catchy. It needs a chorus, three verses and a really cool sax solo. Please solve this for me.'. Chances are people will write back, willing to teach you if you have some spare money, but obviously, they're not immediately inclined to start helping you from scratch.
>
> So:
> 1. read the getting started guide; if you find that a bit too much 'point and click' instead of learning, try some course material (e.g.http://www.cognitology.eu/pubs/AnE-Primer2009.pdf),  
> 2. start writing your experiment, begin with the things you already know how to do (if you still don't know how to do "350ms fixation point, there can be either a cue(duration200ms) or a target( duration 600ms)", go back to step 1)
> 3. notice where exactly you get stuck. Is it the design? List operations? Some kind of coding problem? Crashing?
>
> Best,
> Mich
>
> Michiel Spapé
> Research Fellow
> Perception & Action group
> University of Nottingham
> School of Psychology
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: e-prime at googlegroups.com [mailto:e-prime at googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of leylo
> Sent: 26 March 2010 19:47
> To: E-Prime
> Subject: forward and backward priming
>
> Hi folks...
>
> First of all, I really need to say one more time, how thankful I am to
> everyone who has contributed to this forum...I really learned a lot of
> important and interesting stuff here....
> Thanks....
>
> Now the problem...
>
> After I spent almost five days searching through this (and similar)
> forums for possible solution to my problem, I lost any hope that I'll
> be able to resolve this one by myself. Now, after all that reading I
> only became even more confused and I really have to ask for your help.
>
> Since I'm an e-prime newbie and very bad at explaining things, I
> should probably apologize in advance if the description of experiment
> doesn't turn out to be perfectly clear.... I'll certainly do my best...
>
> In my experiment there are three types of stimuli: fixation dot,
> square-shaped cue and target- letter (target can be one of the 8
> letters -a,b,c,d,w,x,y,z)
>
> After 350ms fixation point, there can be either a cue(duration200ms)
> or a target( duration 600ms).
>
> If cue is presented before target, there are four different
> possibilities; it can be presented either 150ms or 375ms before onset
> of the target, and it can also be presented on the left side or on the
> right side of the screen.
>
> If the target is presented right after the fixation point, then, after
> 100ms it is followed by left or right square-shaped cue ( duration of
> the cue remains the same - 200ms).
>
> Experiment should contain 432 trials, divided into three blocks of
> three repetitions of each condition. Trials should be presented in
> pseudo-random order.
>
> Is there anyone who has some idea how could I make this work??? I
> would really appreciate your help.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "E-Prime" group.
> To post to this group, send email to e-prime at googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to e-prime+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/e-prime?hl=en.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "E-Prime" group.
To post to this group, send email to e-prime at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to e-prime+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/e-prime?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "E-Prime" group.
To post to this group, send email to e-prime at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to e-prime+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/e-prime?hl=en.



More information about the Eprime mailing list