<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Dear Ethnocommers,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Thanks to everyone who has generously responded to my query! I thought I would compile your recommendations and share it with everyone.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="color:#1F497D">1. Work that directly addresses the cultural foundations of the communication discipline / expert systems of communication<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Cameron, D. (2000). <i>Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture</i>. London, U.K.: Sage.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Katz, E., & Fialkoff, Y. (forthcoming). Communication.
<i>Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology</i>.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Peters, J. D. (1999). <i>Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication</i>. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Philipsen, G. (2015). Paying lip service to “speech” in disciplinary naming, 1914-1954. In P. J. Gehrke, & W. M. Keith (Eds.),
<i>A century of communication studies: The unfinished conversation</i> (pp. 46-63). New York, NY: Routledge.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="color:#1F497D">2. “Deeper dives” into the (cultural / Western) meanings of communication and their dissemination around the world<o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Boromisza-Habashi, D. (2016). What we need is good communication: Vernacular globalization in some Hungarian speech.
<i>International Journal of Communication, 10,</i> 4600-4619. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4110/1788<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Carbaugh, D. (1988). <i>Talking American: Cultural discourses on Donahue</i>. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Castor, T., & Bartesaghi, M. (2016). Metacommunication during disaster response: “Reporting” and the constitution of problems in hurricane Katrina teleconferences.
<i>Management Communication Quarterly, 30</i>(4)<i>,</i> 472-502.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Chang, B. G. (1996). <i>Deconstructing communication: Representation, subject, and economies of exchange.</i> University of Minnesota Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Illouz, E. (2003). <i>Oprah Winfrey and the glamour of misery: An essay on popular culture</i>. Columbia UP.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">John, N. (2017). <i>The age of sharing</i>. Cambridge, UK: Polity.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Katriel, T., & Philipsen, G. (1981). “What we need is communication”: “Communication” as a cultural category in some American speech.
<i>Communication Monographs, 48</i>(4)<i>,</i> 301-317.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Cheers, David<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">---<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">David Boromisza-Habashi, Ph.D. (he/him/his)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Associate Professor<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Department of Communication<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">University of Colorado Boulder<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><a href="http://www.colorado.edu/cmci/people/communication/david-boromisza-habashi"><span style="color:#0563C1">CMCI</span></a> |
<a href="https://colorado.academia.edu/DavidBoromiszaHabashi"><span style="color:#0563C1">Academia.edu</span></a> |
<a href="https://twitter.com/dr_dbh"><span style="color:#0563C1">Twitter</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> David Boromisza-Habashi <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, July 18, 2018 12:18 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> ETHNOCOMM@listserv.linguistlist.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> cultural foundations of communication research<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi All,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">An org comm colleague of mine is investigating the US American cultural foundations of communication research, and asked me for relevant references. So far, I am planning to share with her Gerry’s (2015) “Paying lip service to “speech”
in disciplinary naming, 1914-1954,” Peters’s <i>Speaking into the Air</i>, and Cameron’s
<i>Good to Talk</i>, all of which draw on EC scholarship to say important things about the role of US American conceptions of communication in the formation of Communication as a discipline and as an expert system.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I would be grateful if you could share with me any additional references that come to mind!<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Cheers, David<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">---<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">David Boromisza-Habashi, Ph.D. (he/him/his)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Associate Professor<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Department of Communication<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">University of Colorado Boulder<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.colorado.edu/cmci/people/communication/david-boromisza-habashi">CMCI</a> |
<a href="https://colorado.academia.edu/DavidBoromiszaHabashi">Academia.edu</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/dr_dbh">
Twitter</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>