Forwarded: grammaticalization

Ziegeler, D. Debra.Ziegeler at ARTS.MONASH.EDU.AU
Tue Oct 31 11:44:05 UTC 1995

From:          Self <DZIEGELE>
To:            funknet at
Subject:       grammaticalization
Date:          Mon, 30 Oct 1995 12:03:02

Just a thought with regard to Spike Gildea's queries on whether 'it is
appropriate to use grammaticalization to refer to the kind of suppletive
paradigms for the surviving word' - it must be the case that suppletive
forms are one of the resulting consequences of grammaticalization,
rather than a part of the processes, since surely the progressive
decline in lexical functions for a grammaticalizing element would leave
behind a 'vacuum' in lexical domains, to be filled by a new suppletive
form. Also (and this is just off the top of my head), did the form
'wended' assume the place of the former 'went' at the time that
irregular past forms were becoming historically less frequent? Perhaps
if this is the case, then was the incoming past form 'wended' merely in
accord with the historical changes of the time?

Debbie Ziegeler

More information about the Funknet mailing list