edith at uwm.edu
Mon Jun 9 16:31:06 UTC 2008
I, too, am very happy that Fritz has used FUNKNET to call attention to this
paper of his. It is a clear and fair study, one that is of great interest to
all linguists, whether of a functional or formalist persuasion.
----- Original Message -----
From: <bjking at wm.edu>
To: <funknet at mailman.rice.edu>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:43 AM
Subject: [FUNKNET] reading articles
> Hello, I've been a quiet lurker here for years. But I would like to
> respond to Paul Hopper's comment that:
>>, the polemical "article of faith" abstract Fritz Newmeyer has sent round
>>contains no empirical arguments, so it cannot be responded to without
>>reading the entire article.
> If the overall question is "what is to be the nature of Funknet," I'd
> suggest that it's completely appropriate for an author to send an abstract
> of his own devising with a link to the full article. I don't find that
> 'sad' or upsetting. It seems, on the contrary, ONE useful way (among
> others) to invite discussion, in this case from people who are interested
> enough to read further.
> I see no benefit in legislating the way in which people should post about
> their own work.
> Barbara J. King
> Professor of Anthropology
> College of William and Mary
> Williamsburg, VA, USA 23187
> for more about my research + my books please see:
More information about the Funknet