Fwd: CSN Cognitive Linguistics: Cognition, Language, Gesture Vol. 1 No. 18, 11/11/2009
mark.turner at case.edu
Wed Nov 11 17:31:26 UTC 2009
if this message does not display correctly, click here
COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS: COGNITION, LANGUAGE, GESTURE ABSTRACTS
Vol. 1, No. 18: Nov 11, 2009
MARK TURNER, EDITOR
Institute Professor, Case Western Reserve University - Department of Cognitive Science
mark.turner at case.edu
Browse ALL abstracts for this journal
Links: Subscribe ~ Unsubscribe | Distribution | Advisory Board | Submit ~ Revise Your Papers
Table of Contents
William Croft, University of New Mexico
Peirce's Law of Triviality: The Implementation of the Trivium of Logic, Rhetoric, and Grammar; Basic Categories for Linguistics and Literature Studies from a Universal Semiotic Theory
Fee-Alexandra Haase, affiliation not provided to SSRN
Linguistics and Claim Construction
Kristen Jakobsen Osenga, University of Richmond - School of Law
Adam Smith's Rational Choice Linguistics
David M. Levy, George Mason University
COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS: COGNITION, LANGUAGE, GESTURE ABSTRACTS
Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 37, October 2008
WILLIAM CROFT, University of New Mexico
Email: wcroft at unm.edu
Both qualitative concepts and quantitative methods from evolutionary biology have been applied to linguistics. Many linguists have noted the similarity between biological evolution and language change, but usually have only employed selective analogies or metaphors. The development of generalized theories of evolutionary change (Dawkins and Hull) has spawned models of language change based on such generalized theories. These models have led to the positing of new mechanisms of language change and new types of selection that may not have biological parallels. Quantitative methods have been applied to questions of language phylogeny in the past decade. The focus has been on widely accepted families with cognates already established by the comparative method (Indo-European, Bantu, Austronesian). Increasingly sophisticated phylogeny reconstruction models have been applied to these families, to resolve questions of subgrouping, contact and migration. Little progress has been made so far in analyzing sound correspondences in the cognates themselves.
"Peirce's Law of Triviality: The Implementation of the Trivium of Logic, Rhetoric, and Grammar; Basic Categories for Linguistics and Literature Studies from a Universal Semiotic Theory"
FEE-ALEXANDRA HAASE, affiliation not provided to SSRN
Email: F.a.haase at gmx.de
This article focuses on the aspects that refer to linguistics in the works of Charles S. Peirce. His pragmatic philosophy implemented many other sciences and among them is the traditional trivium of logic, grammar, and rhetoric. Peirce divided into different kinds of logic, grammar, and rhetoric. While the impact of the work of Peirce on theses sciences is weak, the integration of the sciences in his philosophy is interesting as a step in the history of science and his work is an example for eclecticism and historism of science in the 19th century and the universalism of science deducted from a philosophy that uses the sign as an unitarian principle. Triple constructions are a very common feature in the writings of Peirce, and the trivium is an example of an academic construction Peirce implemented.
"Linguistics and Claim Construction"
KRISTEN JAKOBSEN OSENGA, University of Richmond - School of Law
Email: kosenga at richmond.edu
Despite its great importance in patent litigation and recent interest derived from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's en banc Phillips opinion, claim construction - the process of giving a patent claim meaning through defining its terms - is largely an unsettled and uncertain area of patent law. In part, this uncertainty may be due to the Federal Circuit's failure to provide adequate guidance on the process. This Article suggests that the Federal Circuit should clarify its claim construction jurisprudence, looking to the science of linguistics to provide bases for an improved set of guidelines that will improve certainty in patent law.
This Article argues that claim construction should instead track the way in which we, as readers of a language, attempt to understand what is being conveyed via the written word. First, there is a base level of conventional understanding from which all interpretation starts, an understanding that either a priori exists based on our earlier encounters with the word or is obtained from a dictionary in cases where we lack previous knowledge. Second, from this conventional understanding, we construct the actual meaning of the term based on a number of linguistic clues, both internal to the document and external from our prior experiences.
In particular, there are at least five notions from linguistics that can help shape a more consistent claim construction methodology: 1) every reader, including a judge, possesses a mental lexicon with a common sense (or conventional) understanding of word meaning which is a point from which to start when interpreting claims; 2) there is an appropriate place for dictionary usage, which is to inform the judge's common sense understanding about a word where he has none; 3) patent claims have their own grammar which must inform the syntactical and contextual analysis, but may also skew the reader's common understanding that was obtained either from a mental lexicon or from a dictionary; 4) regardless of the common sense understanding, the PHOSITA must be returned to the analysis and changes made to the law to effectuate the return of the PHOSITA; and 5) extensive resort to the specification and prosecution history to divine the patentee's intent is inappropriate.
"Adam Smith's Rational Choice Linguistics"
DAVID M. LEVY, George Mason University
Email: DLEVY at GMU.EDU
Adam Smith offers an account, based on rational choice considerations, of the grammatical change experienced by languages when adults attempt to communicate across languages in such a way as to minimize transactions costs. His model predicts what is known to linguists as a "pidgin," a language learned by adults in which to make trades. His model can be extended to predict the grammatical trajectory toward pidgin experienced by dying languages.
Solicitation of Abstracts
"Cognitive linguistics goes beyond the visible structure of language and investigates the considerably more complex backstage operations of cognition that create grammar, conceptualization, discourse, and thought itself. The theoretical insights of cognitive linguistics are based on extensive empirical observation in multiple contexts, and on experimental work in psychology and neuroscience. Results of cognitive linguistics, especially from metaphor theory and conceptual integration theory, have been applied to wide ranges of nonlinguistic phenomena." - Gilles Fauconnier. 2006. "Cognitive Linguistics." Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. John Wiley & Sons.
To submit your research to SSRN, log in to the SSRN User HeadQuarters, and click on the My Papers link on the left menu, and then click on Start New Submission at the top of the page.
If your organization is interested in increasing readership for its research by starting a Research Paper Series, or sponsoring a Subject Matter eJournal, please email: RPS at SSRN.com
Cognitive Science Network (CSN), a division of Social Science Electronic Publishing (SSEP) and Social Science Research Network (SSRN)
Cognitive Linguistics: Cognition, Language, Gesture
Professor of Biological Anthropology and Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley - Department of Anthropology
Professor, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego
RONALD W. LANGACKER
Professor Emeritus, University of California, San Diego - Linguistics Department
Links: Subscribe to Journal | Unsubscribe from Journal | Join Site License | Financial Hardship
You can change your journal subscriptions by logging into SSRN User HQ. If you have questions or problems with this process, please email UserSupport at SSRN.com or call 877-SSRNHelp (877.777.6435 or 585.442.8170). Outside of the United States, call 00+1+585+4428170.
Site License Membership
Many university departments and other institutions have purchased site licenses covering all of the journals in a particular network. If you want to subscribe to any of the SSRN journals, you may be able to do so without charge by first checking to see if your institution currently has a site license.
To do this please click on any of the following URLs. Instructions for joining the site are included on these pages.
Accounting Research Network
NEW Cognitive Science Network NEW
NEW Corporate Governance Network NEW
Economics Research Network
Entrepreneurship Research & Policy Network
Financial Economics Network
Health Economics Network
Information Systems & eBusiness Network
Legal Scholarship Network
Management Research Network
Political Science Network
Social Insurance Research Network
HRN Classics Research Network
HRN English & American Literature Research Network
HRN Philosophy Research Network
If your institution or department is not listed as a site, we would be happy to work with you to set one up. Please contact site at ssrn.com for more information.
Individual Membership (for those not covered by a site license)
Join a site license, request a trial subscription, or purchase a subscription within the SSRN User HeadQuarters: http://www.ssrn.com/subscribe
SSRN understands there is financial hardship in certain countries (for example the former Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc). If you are undergoing financial hardship and believe you cannot pay for a journal, please send a detailed explanation to Subscribe at SSRN.com
To ensure delivery of this journal, please add CSN at publish.ssrn.com (Mark Turner) to your email contact list. If you are missing an issue or are having any problems with your subscription, please Email usersupport at ssrn.com or call 877-SSRNHELP (877.777.6435 or 585.442.8170).
FORWARDING & REDISTRIBUTION
Subscriptions to the journal are for single users. You may forward a particular eJournal issue, or an excerpt from an issue, to an individual or individuals who might be interested in it. It is a violation of copyright to redistribute this eJournal on a recurring basis to another person or persons, without the permission of Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. For information about individual subscriptions and site licenses, please contact us at Site at SSRN.com
Copyright © 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved
More information about the Funknet