Outsiders' views of the value of linguistics

[A. Katz]

John,

I have some experience with linguists running language pedagogy seminars 
in the United States. The people running the seminars had never taught a 
foreign language, and they were mostly monolingual English speakers. The 
people teaching the foreign languages who were forced (yes, forced!) to 
attend the seminar were mostly native speakers of the languages they 
taught who did not have tenure. (The tenured foreign language professors 
were apparently spared this.) It was a complete farce.

    --Aya




On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, john at research.haifa.ac.il wrote:

> Exactly my point. Where language teaching is taken seriously, the need for
> linguistics is self-evident. In the United States, it's much harder.
> John
>
>
>
> Quoting "Danielle E. Cyr" <dcyr at yorku.ca>:
>
>> Canada's official bilingualism makes the teaching of linguistics very
>> important
>> both in English departments, French Studies and general linguistics. In my
>> French Studies department, for example, students enter with the mere
>> intention
>> to learn and teach French. All of them have to take an introductory course to
>> linguistics and 18 more credits in more advanced courses in linguistics. At
>> the
>> introductory course level I make sure that, for every aspect of internal and
>> external linguistics, I make my students aware of the jobs attached to that
>> chunk of knowledge:
>>
>> INTERNAL LINGUISTICS:
>> - for phonetics/phonology :speech re-education, voice recognition, cochlear
>> implants, digital song editing, and even linguistic spying;
>> - for morphology : speech therapy, language teaching and language teaching
>> materials, lexicography, artificial intelligence, among others;
>> - for syntax : language teaching, artificial intelligence, language
>> re-education;
>>  - for semantics : lexicography, literature; philosophy, psychology, history,
>> intercultural studies, political studies, law, commerce, diplomacy;
>> EXTERNAL LINGUISTICS:
>> - for socio- and psycholinguistics: a better access to individual and social
>> understanding, among others workplace relationships, psychology, ethics,
>> intercultural studies, etc.
>> - for historical linguistics: the history of social change, the history of
>> international contacts through time and space, the history of ideas, etc.
>> - for political linguistics (history of language laws in Canada): a better
>> understanding of Canada's history, ofCanada's populations's history, of the
>> making of ideas and identities, of the role of languages in the building of
>> nationhoods, etc.
>>
>> They also say that linguistics helps them in their acquisition of French and,
>> for those who are in a concurrent program in Education, that it helps them in
>> their teaching practicum. Most of them reckon that linguistics helps them in
>> all areas of their college courses and contribute their linguistic knowledge
>> in
>> their other class discussions.
>>
>> In the end many of my students are convinced that studying linguistics makes
>> them more enlightened human beings and citizens. They are also aware that
>> their
>> studies in linguistics can make them better teachers, lawyers, jurists,
>> diplomats, psychologists, writers, physicians, journalists, translators,
>> merchants, parents, caregivers, etc. etc. etc.
>>
>> Not bad after all. And, when after twenty years in the profession of
>> linguist, I
>> count that I have help producing at least 2,000 such citizens, I have no
>> problem
>> explaining to the general population that linguistics is really useful and
>> also
>> a source of pleasure and happiness :)
>>
>> Danielle
>>
>> P.S. By the way, some years ago I picked the following quotation somewhere. I
>> liked it so much that I use it in my signature. However, I don't know who the
>> author i and it makes me feel bad that I am using someone's wisdom without
>> acknowledging him/her. Would any of you recognize its source?
>>
>> "The only hope we have as human beings is to learn each other's languages.
>> Only
>> then can we truly hope to understand one another."
>> Quoting john at research.haifa.ac.il:
>>
>>> It isn't just grammar teaching, it's also foreign language teaching in
>>> general.
>>> English speakers tend not even to think of this since in English-speaking
>>> countries there is no serious expectation that foreign language classes
>> will
>>> produce students who can actually practically use the language that they're
>>> supposedly learning. But in countries in which foreign language teaching is
>>> taken seriously, people naturally recognize the connection to linguistics.
>>> When people in Israel ask me what being a linguist entails, my first stock
>>> answer is 'we train people to be English teachers.'
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Richard Hudson <dick at ling.ucl.ac.uk>:
>>>
>>>> Dear Fritz,
>>>> I agree entirely with Olga. The discussion has a very anglo-phone bias
>>>> away from education - the UK, USA etc all have a tradition in which
>>>> school teachers aren't expected to have learned anything about language
>>>> at university, so academic research on language isn't relevant to
>>>> education. We're very different from many parts of Europe, where grammar
>>>> teaching is an important part of the school curriculum and trainee
>>>> teachers update their understanding at university. I'm sure in a country
>>>> like that, linguistics would be justified in part by its contribution to
>>>> education. I don't know of any bibliographical source for this - if
>>>> anyone does, I'd love to see it. I've written quite a bit about the
>>>> value of linguistics for education (see
>>>> www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dick/papers.htm) but haven't been able to do
>>>> much on that line except pick up odds and ends from gossip. (I do have
>>>> evidence that school kids know a great deal more grammar in countries
>>>> such as Spain - see
>>>> http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dick/ec/ba-kal/ba-kal.htm.)
>>>>
>>>> Dick (Hudson)
>>>>
>>>> Richard Hudson www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dick/home.htm
>>>>
>>>> On 20/10/2010 18:43, Yokoyama, Olga wrote:
>>>>> Fritz,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I take it that your article is about the academic community's attitudes
>>>> towards linguistics. Although not part of your topic but still very
>>> important
>>>> for the status of linguistics and the budgetary decisions made especially
>>> in
>>>> public institutions are attitudes towards linguistics in the lay society.
>>> We
>>>> all have experienced the routine questioning along the lines of "Oh,
>> you're
>>> a
>>>> linguist? So how many languages do you know?". Misunderstandings out
>> there
>>>> are vast and we linguists need to address them. One way my department did
>>> it
>>>> this summer was by addressing the Arizona ruling on teachers with
>> accented
>>>> English in a public conference, which combined international scholars and
>>>> practitioners in one room
>>>> (http://sites.google.com/site/uclalinguisticdiversconf2010/). U. Oregon's
>>>> Olympiad for secondary school students is another step in the right
>>>> direction. Linguists need to start talking to the public at large and
>> make
>>>> sure that the future generations don’t vote for closing linguistics and
>>>> language departments (cf. the latest SUNY Albany case) based on budget
>>>> considerations combined with glaring ignorance about what language
>> studies
>>>> are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Olga
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Olga T. Yokoyama
>>>>>
>>>>> Professor and Chair
>>>>>
>>>>> Department of Applied Linguistics and TESL
>>>>>
>>>>> University of California, Los Angeles
>>>>>
>>>>> Tel. (310) 825-4631
>>>>>
>>>>> Fax (310) 206-4118
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.appling.ucla.edu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: funknet-bounces at mailman.rice.edu
>>>> [mailto:funknet-bounces at mailman.rice.edu] On Behalf Of Frederick J
>> Newmeyer
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 10:13 AM
>>>>> To: Funknet
>>>>> Subject: [FUNKNET] Outsiders' views of the value of linguistics
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For a survey article that I'm writing, I plan to assemble quotes from
>>>> people outside the field of linguistics on what they see as the value, or
>>>> lack of value, of work done in linguistics. So I would like to cite
>>> published
>>>> quotes from psychologists, anthropologists, literary specialists, etc. on
>>>> their views about the value/relevance of linguistics for their particular
>>>> concerns and its value/relevance in general. Can anybody help me out by
>>>> pointing me to relevant quotes?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me give one example of the sort of thing that I am looking for. The
>>>> late computational linguist Fred Jelinek reportedly wrote: 'Whenever I
>>> fire
>>>> a linguist our system performance improves'.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks. I'll summarize.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --fritz
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> fjn at u.washington.edu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Frederick J. Newmeyer
>>>>>
>>>>> Professor Emeritus, University of Washington
>>>>>
>>>>> Adjunct Professor, University of British Columbia and Simon Fraser
>>>> University
>>>>>
>>>>> [for my postal address, please contact me by e-mail]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message was sent using IMP, the Webmail Program of Haifa University
>>>
>>
>>
>> "The only hope we have as human beings is to learn each other's languages.
>> Only
>> then can we truly hope to understand one another."
>>
>> Professor Danielle E. Cyr
>> Department of French Studies
>> York University
>> Toronto, ON, Canada, M3J 1P3
>> Tel. 1.416.736.2100 #310180
>> FAX. 1.416.736.5924
>> dcyr at yorku.ca
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Webmail Program of Haifa University
>
>