Grammar

[anheropl0x]

It's not so much the suh as it is the enclitic -uh. It's a way of saying and (jah) without another word. And I'm not sure what you mean by Jordanes' book. Perhaps you mean De Origine Actibisque Getarum? Notice the enclitic -que used in Latin. It's the exact same thing as Gothic's -uh.

--- In gothic-l at yahoogroups.com, OSCAR HERRE <duke.co at ...> wrote:
>
> what does the suh emphasize....were talking about jordanes book for example....
> 
> --- On Sat, 3/27/10, anheropl0x <anheropl0x at ...> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: anheropl0x <anheropl0x at ...>
> Subject: [gothic-l] Grammar
> To: gothic-l at yahoogroups.com
> Date: Saturday, March 27, 2010, 11:55 PM
> 
> 
> Â  
> 
> 
> 
> Hails!
> 
> Quick question. Is "Ïohannes Þiudanes liuda bokosuh frisahteisuh" grammatically correct? Thanks in advanced!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/gothic-l/attachments/20100328/e0ea3454/attachment.htm>