New ways of discussion.

[Frithureiks]

It seems to be like the majority likes the way it is.
I can see why from your argumentations. I surrender :)

But, I think a advantage with a forum is that it is possible to have a lot of different discussions going on simultaneously. Now we have one or two and the older disappears (even though they might be found easily).

About discussions over history and archeology, there is no obstacles to discuss these themes. You who want to do this, start one!


--- In gothic-l at yahoogroups.com, Grsartor at ... wrote:
>
> I am happy with how we currently work. The group may in a sense be more  
> active than it seems, since no doubt messages will often be read with interest 
>  by many members that do not feel they have anything to add.
>  
>  
>  
> In a message dated 16/05/2011 17:09:42 GMT Daylight Time,  
> gadrauhts at ... writes:
> 
> This  might be controversial but I want to ask the members of this list if 
> it could  be a good idea to think about a new way of discussions.
> We are now 630  members of this list and it has been sent over 10500 
> messenges. But lately  these last years it is not very active anymore as it was 
> when I became a  member, as I recall.
> 
> How could be make all 630 members active?
> Could  it be better with another form of forum, such as modern forums?
> 
> I would  probably prefer such a forum, since it makes it possible to make 
> different  sections of themes. There could be one for gothic history, one for 
> culture,  one for translation help, one for neogothic and neologisms etc,  
> etc.
> 
> What do you all 630 people think about  it??
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> You are a  member of the Gothic-L list.  To unsubscribe, send a blank email 
> to  <gothic-l-unsubscribe at egroups.com>.Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/gothic-l/attachments/20110517/9fb9e8bf/attachment.htm>