<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;"><div><div><div><div><font face="'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 12px;"><b><br></b></span></font></div>
<div><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 12px; "><b>International Symposium: Contact Among Genetically Related Languages</b></span></div>
<div>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'; min-height: 15.0px">
<b></b><br>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
Organizers: Patience Epps, John Huehnergard, Na'ama Pat-El</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
April 21-22, 2012</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'; min-height: 15.0px">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
One of the major issues discussed in the context of contact is the question of linguistic structure and what contribution typological structural similarity has on the extent of borrowing. The assumption that similar structure is an essential factor in borrowability
(“structural compatibility requirement”), which was common early on (Weinreich 1953; Moravcsik 1978) has been abandoned, but recent studies suggest that there is some correlation between structural similarity and structural changes, although this may hold
only as a tendency (Haig 2001). To date, most investigations of contact phenomena have focused on languages coming from different or only distantly related families. In such languages, if any similarity exists, it is typological, rather than genetic. Yet the
issue of contact among genetically related languages is a crucial problem for historical linguistics, with profound implications for determining subgrouping among related languages, reconstructing protolanguages, and understanding the histories of their speakers.
In the past, historical linguistics often worked under the assumption that languages split from a common language (proto-language) and developed independently thereafter. The effects of contact among related languages may lead to erroneous family trees, in
which languages are assigned to incorrect nodes on the basis of borrowed similarities. Yet despite these challenges, detailed investigation that weighs different features according to their relative borrowability can make progress toward untangling these complex
linguistic relationships. Establishing the methodological best practices and most common pitfalls in distinguishing contact from genetic inheritance remains an outstanding challenge in historical linguistics. Therefore, we plan to conduct an international
workshop where relevant test cases will be presented and theoretical debates may further our understanding of the effect of genetic relation on the results of language contact.</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'; min-height: 15.0px">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'; min-height: 15.0px">
The workshop is free and open to the public.</p>
<div>For more details, please go to: <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/mes/events/conferences/language_contact_2012/language_contact_2012.php">http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/mes/events/conferences/language_contact_2012/language_contact_2012.php</a></div>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'; min-height: 15.0px">
<br>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
Participants:</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<b>Paul-Alain Beaulieu </b>(University of Toronto)</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<i><span style="white-space:pre"></span>Semitic Languages Interaction in First Millennium BC Iraq</i></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<b>Claire Bowern </b>(Yale)</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<span style="white-space:pre"></span><i>Linguistic Split and Language Contact</i></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<b>Bridget Drinka </b>(UT San Antonio)</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<span style="white-space:pre"></span><i>Contact, Genetic Relationship, and a New Family Tree Model</i></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<b>Patience Epps </b>(UT Austin)</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 36.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<i>Tracing the histories of morphologically complex forms: inheritance, calquing, or independent innovation?</i></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<b>Danny Law </b>(Vanderbilt University)</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 36.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<i>Three ways that genetic relatedness shaped the outcome of language contact in the Maya lowlands</i></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<b>Maarten Kossmann </b>(Leiden University)</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<i><span style="white-space:pre"></span>Divergence and convergence: a history of Moroccan Arabic</i></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<b>Alexander Magidow </b>(UT Austin)</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<span style="white-space:pre"></span><i>Diachrony and Dialects</i></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<b>H. Craig Melchert </b>(UCLA)</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<span style="white-space:pre"></span><i>Hittite and Hieroglyphic Luvian
</i>arha <i>‘away': Common Inheritance or Borrowing?</i></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<b>Marianne Mithun </b>(UC Sanata Barbara)</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<span style="white-space:pre"></span><i>Challenges and Benefits of Contact among Relatives</i></p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<b>Na’ama Pat-El </b>(UT Austin)</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 6.0px 36.0px; text-align: justify; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'">
<i>Contact or Inheritance? Criteria for distinguishing internal and external change in genetically related languages</i></p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>