HPSG is not generative grammar

Carl Pollard pollard at ling.ohio-state.edu
Sat Jan 1 07:58:31 UTC 2000


Hi Adam,

That's fascinating. I always thought any kind of mathematical
system that (inter alia) determined a set of strings or a set
of structural representations of some kind or other counted
as a generative grammar. I wonder whether Neil Smith's usage
had any mathematical conception behind it, or if he was just using
the term "generative grammar" as an informal synonym for
Chomsky-style linguistically oriented activity.

Carl

>
In case you ever wondered whether the term `generative grammar' encompasses
HPSG or not, there is now a definite answer to this question:

"For alternatives to generative grammar, see inter alia Borsley, 1996;
 Pollard & Sag, 1994; Steedman, 1993; Bresnan, 1994; Hudson, 1990."

This is a quote from: Neil Smith (1999), "Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals",
p.223, Cambridge University Press.

Happy New Year, to generative and non-generative grammarians alike,

	Adam P.

--
           ,
ADAM PRZEPIORKOWSKI
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Ohio State University   | work: (USA) (614) 292 5389
Department of Linguistics   | home: (USA) (614) 261 1572
222 Oxley Hall              | fax:  (USA) (614) 292 8833
1712 Neil Ave.              |
Columbus OH 43210           | email: adamp at ling.ohio-state.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------
URL:  http://www.ipipan.waw.pl/mmgroup/ap.html
--------------------------------------------------------------

On leave from the Institute of Computer Science,
Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw.
>>



More information about the HPSG-L mailing list