multiple copies

[John Beavers]

Tom (and Carl and others):

Yeah, I noticed the multiple messages problem.  It appears that every
message getting delivered to a certain address is getting bounced back to
the list again.  I checked the message headers, and the originating server
changes, but the original delivery address remains the same, namely:

Delivered-To: icqmail.com%gsghyd at icqmail.com

>From which some pickup service bounces it back to hpsg-l.  Does that
address look familiar to anyone?  At any rate, whoever administers the
list ought to be informed.

Below is a full header from a typical bounced message.

Oh, and for my on-topic portion of the message I'll just say that I'm
avoiding the HPSG vs. P&P debate entirely as it keeps my blood pressure
down. :-)

Cheers,
John

Received: from lists.Stanford.EDU (lists.Stanford.EDU [171.64.14.236])
        by hypatia.Stanford.EDU (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
f410jF522685;
        Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root at localhost)
        by lists.Stanford.EDU (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f410gMn16050
        for hpsg-l-out778767; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eth.net (smtp.eth.net [202.9.145.18])
        by lists.Stanford.EDU (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f410gKD16044
        for <hpsg-l at lists.stanford.edu>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:42:20 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by eth.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
         Tue, 1 May 2001 05:57:22 +0530
Received: from c005.sfo.cp.net ([209.228.13.53]) by eth.net  with
Microsoft
    SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53);
         Tue, 1 May 2001 02:50:13 +0530
Received: (cpmta 1610 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2001 14:27:40 -0700
Delivered-To: icqmail.com%gsghyd at icqmail.com
Received: (cpmta 1572 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2001 14:27:38 -0700
Received: from lists.Stanford.EDU (171.64.14.236)
  by smtp.c005.sfo.cp.net (209.228.13.53) with SMTP; 30 Apr 2001 14:27:38
-0700
X-Received: 30 Apr 2001 21:27:38 GMT
Received: (from root at localhost)
        by lists.Stanford.EDU (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f3UK7YU20650
        for hpsg-l-out778767; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from socrates.Berkeley.EDU (socrates.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.25.13])
        by lists.Stanford.EDU (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3UK7XD20645
        for <hpsg-l at lists.Stanford.EDU>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:07:33 -0700
(PDT)
Received: (from kathol at localhost)
        by socrates.Berkeley.EDU (8.10.2/8.10.2) id f3UK7Wl20601;
        Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andreas Kathol <kathol at socrates.berkeley.edu>
Message-Id: <200104302007.f3UK7Wl20601 at socrates.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: The appeal of P&P
To: pollard at ling.ohio-state.edu (Carl Pollard)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: The appeal of P&P
Cc: hpsg-l at lists.Stanford.EDU
In-Reply-To: <200104301937.PAA11400 at julius.ling.ohio-state.edu> from "Carl
    Pollard" at Apr 30, 2001 03:37:12 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hpsg-l at lists.Stanford.EDU
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 3792

On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Tom Wasow wrote:

> I've been getting multiple copies of all the messages in this now rather
> lengthy discussion of HPSG vs. P&P.  Does anyone know how to avoid this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tom
>
>
>