differences between SBCG and ECxG

Mariana Hebborn m.hebborn at googlemail.com
Fri Jul 22 09:22:47 UTC 2011


Thank you all!
@
Stefan, thank you for that great comparison! That's exactly what I looked
for! I know your books that are my 'first aid equipment' ;)

Best regards Mariana

2011/7/21 Stefan Müller <Stefan.Mueller at fu-berlin.de>

> > Embodied CxG differs from SB-CxG with regard to locality assumptions.
> > ECxG does not have a MOTHERS feature and hence is more similar to old
> > school HPSG. Richter and Sailer argued in 2009 that the locality
> > assumptions of SB-CxG are too strong to account for certain idioms and
> > hence the current state of the art seems to be something equivalent to
> > PS94.
>
> Referring to Sag 1997 rather than PS94 would have been more appropriate
> in the above paragraph. There was a change in the treatment of daughters
> and phrases from PS94 to Sag, 1997, which is important.
>
> Sorry for this mistake.
>
> Best wishes
>
>        Stefan
>
> --
> Stefan Müller       Tel: (+49) (+30) 838 52973
>                    Fax: (+49) (030) 838 4 52973
> Institut für Deutsche und Niederländische Philologie
> Deutsche Grammatik
> Habelschwerdter Allee 45
> 14 195 Berlin
>
> http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/
>
> http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Babel/Interaktiv/
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/hpsg-l/attachments/20110722/fabc33ef/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------



More information about the HPSG-L mailing list