Court rules against Yup ’'ik as an historically written language ...

[s.t. bischoff]

Thanks Bill...very interesting.

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:32 AM, William J Poser <wjposer at ldc.upenn.edu>
wrote:

> I have posted my thoughts on the ruling, with links to the ruling
> and other documents, on Language Log:
> http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=396
>
> In context I don't think that the ruling is as outrageous as it
> sounds.
>
> Bill
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/ilat/attachments/20080724/6e3bde21/attachment.htm>