<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16441"></HEAD>
<BODY><!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P> Another rant maybe. Perhaps
9/10ths of the unseen iceberg as a metaphor, is these languages were never meant
to survive in a so called 'post colonial' New World. Their intentional
destruction is 'fact' well known by the survivors and historically documented.
Perhaps language loss is merely a symptom of why these languages are being lost.
Perhaps the problem is not even with the 'peoples' but external to them and
built into the fabric of what has become 'the Americas'. If there is such a
great moral interest in the survival of endangered indigenous languages and the
home and community are the conduits for language transmission then the family,
people and the community must also be repaired from the ravaging destruction of
both overt, covert and insidious colonialism. Perhaps the people and communities
must be involved in the development of their own language survival programs in a
manner which validates their own intelligence and worth, culture, cosmology and
life paths. There is not much point bringing into the communities, 'for the
people', a pre-formulated pedagogy for language skills when the real problem is
their total cultural, linguistic and spiritual survival. All of the tribes
survived with their myriad of languages until 'somebody done somebody wrong' and
have never identified or corrected that wrong. It must be understood, accepted
and dealt with that these 'tribal' languages have their own 'already there'
which is as different from everyone else's 'already there'. Their 'already lived
in languages' are as different from each tribe and the rest of the world as
Chinese is from Gaelic. These tribal languages have absolutely no 'cognate'
relationship to any other language than their own dialects and those languages
are generated in a 'primary orality'. Any linguist must be aware of this...guess
I should stop here before I am reminded I am off topic again...apologies. There
is so much more can be said...I live 'inside' this destruction and loss. I deal
with it every day and not from some evangelical
ardor.<BR> I agree with many of the
points you make Rudy outside the idea that institutionalization can be an
solution. Institutions have not yet provided or even acted on any long term
survival, a fact which is becoming even more apparent as we move with ever
increasing speed toward the demise of this present civilization and perhaps even
the earth itself. These endangered languages are symbiotically tied to the earth
and the cosmos. Institutions have little if anything to offer them other than
jobs teaching endangered languages. You cannot expect these peoples to embrace
institutionalization which has no history of benefits to them...in fact
documented evidence to the opposite. There has to be something new and
innovative to accommodate a new and changed environment. Please don't ask me
what it is...I have been working on it for almost 50 years. My greatest
successes happened in the mid-60s and early
70s.<BR> During the early 70s, I was a
coordinator for Keewatinung Institute, a cultural, educational and spiritual
center for our people in our area. We were the very first of our kind in Canada.
>From that position, I had the absolutely fantastic opportunity of coordinating
The Indian Ecumenical Conference...a gathering of spiritual leaders from as many
tribes we could get representatives from. It was 'ecumenical' in the broader
meaning of the term. We had a Steering Committee of elders and spiritual leaders
to help with the development of logistics and content for the first great
gathering at Morley, Alberta. During the planning sessions over many months and
in many locations, the idea of an 'agenda' came up. The Steering Committee after
thinking on it told us we didn't need an agenda. Those of us 'trained' to think
'inside the box' felt we had to have plans and objectives and to know what we
were going to do. The elders and spiritual leaders told us what we would do is
to look at how we were 500 years ago, how we look today and how we want to look
in another 500 years. So, that was the 'gist' of our getting together. I still
think of that especially when I hear out tribal councils and politicians
speaking of five year plans, 10 year plans and sometimes a 20/25 year plan. Our
gatherings were very, very successful and the spin off is still felt today...and
we are still at it 40 some years later. You can read about it in a book entitled
'Around the sacred fire: a native religious activism in the Red Power era : a
narrative map of the Indian Ecumenical Conference' by James Treat. I am adding a
short review if anyone is interested.</P>
<P><SPAN class=fn><SPAN dir=ltr><STRONG>Around the sacred
fire</STRONG></SPAN></SPAN>: <SPAN class=subtitle><SPAN dir=ltr>a native
religious activism in the Red Power era : a narrative map of the Indian
Ecumenical Conference. <A class=secondary
href="http://www.google.ca/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=inauthor:%22James+Treat%22"><SPAN
dir=ltr>James Treat</SPAN></A> . <SPAN dir=ltr>Palgrave Macmillan</SPAN>,
<SPAN dir=ltr>2003</SPAN> - <A class=secondary
href="http://www.google.ca/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=subject:%22History%22&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0"><SPAN
dir=ltr>History</SPAN></A> - <SPAN dir=ltr>376 pages</SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></P>
<DIV class=bookcover><A
href="http://books.google.ca/books?id=r-0L3IUPDRQC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0"><IMG
id=summary-frontcover title="Front Cover" border=1 alt="Front Cover"
src="http://bks9.books.google.ca/books?id=r-0L3IUPDRQC&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=1&edge=curl"
width=128></A> </DIV>
<DIV class=bookinfo_sectionwrap>
<DIV><SPAN style="DISPLAY: block" id=gb-atb-plusone-container>
<DIV
style="BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0pt; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; TEXT-INDENT: 0pt; MARGIN: 0pt; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; PADDING-LEFT: 0pt; WIDTH: 70px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0pt; DISPLAY: inline-block; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; FLOAT: none; HEIGHT: 15px; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; FONT-SIZE: 1px; VERTICAL-ALIGN: baseline; PADDING-TOP: 0pt"
id=___plusone_0><IFRAME
style="POSITION: static; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none; MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; WIDTH: 70px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; HEIGHT: 15px; VISIBILITY: visible; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; TOP: 0pt; LEFT: 0pt"
id=I1_1332896563095 title=+1 tabIndex=-1 marginHeight=0
src="https://plusone.google.com/u/0/_/+1/fastbutton?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.ca%2Fbooks%2Fabout%2FAround_the_sacred_fire.html%3Fid%3Dr-0L3IUPDRQC&size=small&count=true&source=google%3ABOOKS&hl=en&jsh=m%3B%2F_%2Fapps-static%2F_%2Fjs%2Fwidget%2F__features__%2Frt%3Dj%2Fver%3DSvSTGk8PZnM.en.%2Fsv%3D1%2Fam%3D%21K2t8zmDaIyaNjPbXTQ%2Fd%3D1%2F#id=I1_1332896563095&parent=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.ca&rpctoken=664494854&_methods=onPlusOne%2C_ready%2C_close%2C_open%2C_resizeMe%2C_renderstart"
frameBorder=0 width="100%" allowTransparency name=I1_1332896563095 marginWidth=0
scrolling=no></IFRAME></DIV></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV class="reviewaggregate hreview-aggregate"><SPAN
class=num-ratings></SPAN><SPAN
class=gb-my-library-book-plusone-container></SPAN><SPAN
dir=ltr></SPAN> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV id=synopsis>
<DIV style="HEIGHT: 100%; OVERFLOW: hidden" id=synopsis-window>
<DIV dir=ltr id=synopsistext class=sa>Around the Sacred Fire is a compelling
cultural history of intertribal activism centered on the Indian Ecumenical
Conference, an influential movement among native people in Canada and the U.S.
during the Red Power era. Founded in 1969, the Conference began as an attempt at
organizing grassroots spiritual leaders who were concerned about the conflict
between tribal and Christian traditions throughout Indian country. By the
mid-seventies thousands of people were gathering each summer in the foothills of
the Rockies, where they participated in weeklong encampments promoting spiritual
revitalization and religious self-determination. Most historical overviews of
native affairs in the sixties and seventies emphasize the prominence of the
American Indian Movement and the impact of highly publicized confrontations such
as the Northwest Coast fish-ins, the Alcatraz occupation, and events at Wounded
Knee. The Indian Ecumenical Conference played a central role in stimulating
cultural revival among native people, partly because Conference leaders
strategized for social change in ways that differed from the militant groups.
Drawing on archival records, published accounts, oral histories, and field
research, James Treat has written the first comprehensive study of this
important but overlooked effort at postcolonial interreligious
dialogue.</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<P>The closing review statement may sound like it was a failure...it was not or
there would be no global indigenous peoples movement and an increasingly unified
global voice. Treat's book will be the most you ever find on it because, it was
meant to be that way. Our only paper trails were briefs for funding and
resulting financial statements. There were no native 'political' so called
leaders, tribal councils or politicians...they didn't even know it was
happening...not that any of them would have cared. Anyhow, I had best conclude
my rant and thanks for listening...if you did so. I am turtle clan and
usually have slow and sometimes lengthy excursions through my own
thoughts. megwetch....<BR><BR>wahjeh<BR>rolland
nadjiwon<BR>_____________________________________<BR>"Political correctness is a
doctrine, fostered by a delusional,<BR>illogical minority, and rabidly promoted
by an unscrupulous mainstream media,<BR>which holds forth the proposition that
it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of shit by the clean
end."<BR><BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: Indigenous Languages and
Technology [<A
href="mailto:ILAT@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU">mailto:ILAT@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU</A>] On
Behalf Of Rudy Troike<BR>Sent: March-27-12 7:12 PM<BR>To:
ILAT@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU<BR>Subject: Re: [ILAT] I wonder if this would be true
for Native languages<BR><BR>I agree with James Crippen's concerns about highly
endangered languages:<BR><BR>"There's a dangerous temptation to somehow make
schooling into the saviour for highly endangered languages. ... Depending solely
on education institutions to solve language decline just seems to make things
worse, not better, because it encourages people to *not* take an active role in
keeping the language alive."<BR><BR>As I noted in a subsequent post, the Navajo
bilingual program at Rock Point, before it declined, demonstrated that for a
Native language, it IS possible to develop a thorough K-12 curriculum which
matches the English curriculum (but includes native cultural and historical
content, and even in math is sensitive to linguistic features of the language
differing from or lacking in English). Where there are enough speakers to
support the effort, it could be possible in communities like the Dakota to
restore the level of literacy which once existed -- though the window of
opportunity is rapidly closing down.<BR><BR>But as James said, this cannot be
carried just by the schools, since real language learning begins in the home and
in interpersonal inter- action. However, thanks to the tradition of government
and parochial schooling, many if not most parents are unable to provide that
'home nest' for the child. That is why a community effort like that in New
Zealand and Hawaii, to place young children with older fluent speakers in
'nests' or day-care centers (better yet, for a whole summer) can be effective in
establishing early natural (not formally instructed) acquisition, which can then
be brought to school and reinforced. A holistic plan is needed which involves
more than just individual families.<BR><BR>One of the perennial problems in
Native language maintenance is that 'higher-level' academic competence is
non-existent, and community members and students perceive that there is 'no use'
in learning the language since it has no further 'marketplace' value. Attitudes
thus play an enormous role both in the perspective of the community and of
students. Developing literacy in the Native language is empowering, and even at
advanced (high school and college) levels, if academically advanced materials
are developed, parallel literacy is possible. This is what the Rock Point
program spectacularly demonstrated, and is showing some effect in Cherokee in
Oklahoma as well.<BR><BR>The use of Native languages in schools has, as the new
Colorado law has shown, given institutional recognition to these languages and
brought Native language speakers into the school setting for the first
time.<BR>So it is not just an either/or situation -- meaningful school
instruction can provide a mooring-post for communities and families to rally
around.<BR><BR>Communities, families, and individuals must ultimately take
primary responsibility for language maintenance and preservation. It can't, as
James says, just be pushed off to schools to somehow magically accomplish alone.
Without motivation, buy-in, and active participation, endangered languages
cannot survive on their own.<BR><BR> Rudy Troike<BR><BR><BR>-----<BR>No
virus found in this message.<BR>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<BR>Version:
2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4896 - Release Date:
03/26/12<BR></P></BODY></HTML>