Personal Pronouns

[Brent J. Ermlick]

petegray wrote:

> I must disagree with your last point here.   An ergative description of
> early PIE or pre-PIE explains various oddities in PIE.   I agree that there
> are no arguments (yet) that it must have been ergative, and none that it
> cannot have been ergative, but in light of its explanatory potential, it
> surely is at least "interesting".

OK, would you care to explain which oddities?

--
Brent J. Ermlick		Veritas liberabit uos
brent at bermls.oau.org