*G^EN-

[Rich Alderson]

On 1 Jun 2001, Patrick Ryan wrote, with respect to *gen{H_1}:

> Are you also asserting that, therefore, there is no *g^en-?

Yes.

And don't come at me with arguments about Wurzeldeterminativa usw.  If such are
not simply the result of over-analysis of the data, they are clearly so early
in the prehistory of the IE language that they may well be Nostratic, and in
any case are irrelevant to the question as posited.

								Rich Alderson